Instigator / Pro
Points: 24

somebody please neuter my fucking testicles right out of my fucking nutsack

Finished

The voting period has ended

After 6 votes the winner is ...
RationalMadman
Debate details
Publication date
Last update
Category
Fashion
Time for argument
Three days
Voting system
Open voting
Voting period
One week
Point system
Four points
Rating mode
Rated
Characters per argument
30,000
Contender / Con
Points: 39
Description
No information
Round 1
Published:
This is not serious so go away and accept my other debate already.
Published:
Pro has full burden of proof in this debate. This horrific act done to himself is something we should be very against.
Round 2
Published:
I am asking you to please neuter my fucking testicles, I take this as a no (sad face)
Published:
Yes, it's a no. Self-harm is not a good thing.

Unlike a woman, when a man is sterilized he loses his entire sexuality with it (the urge too etc). Your testicles are very important.

The testicles also produce the hormone testosterone. Hormones are chemical messengers that help to control different activities in our bodies. Testosterone helps with:

  • your sex drive (libido)
  • getting an erection
  • having a deep voice
  • facial and body hair
  • muscle development.
Round 3
Published:
you probly know
my godly flow
is more precise than a karate blow
I slap a sloppy hoe
with cock meat, bro
her pussy looks like soggy toast.
Published:
Exactly. You shouldn't lose your magnificent cock nor the balls that go with them.
Added:
LOL I love how this went in fashion
#13
Added:
Mod note: Troll debates are not moderated
#12
Added:
--> @SupaDudz
I believe that this is pretty good proof of Sparrow being Type1.
#11
Added:
--> @RationalMadman
Fixed. Will take care of vote when I get home
#10
Added:
As Sparrow I hereby confirm that this IS in fact a troll debate and the winner is arbitrary because it isn't even a debate technically.
Instigator
#9
Added:
That debate doesn't meet the criteria of the agreed upon troll debate criterion. I agreed to a non troll debate on neutering Sparrow. He could have made a strong pro-trans operation case but put zero effort in. I won it and deserve my rating and moderation of the debate votes.
I agreed to it being moderated you can't go in and change it against my will and force me to have to put the effort into debating it.
Contender
#8
Added:
Please don't mod SupaDudz vote. This debate is arbitrary anyway as the title isn't even a debate topic and RM just wants more points which he didn't earn.
Instigator
#7
Added:
--> @Virtuoso
Please mod supadudz vote
Contender
#6
Added:
--> @Virtuoso
https://www.debateart.com/debates/1012/vote_links/2383
Please handle this vote if 'unmoderated' doesn't mean that you don't moderate votes, thanks.
Contender
#5
Added:
ok holy shit this might type1
#4
Added:
--> @RationalMadman
We'll look into it. Thanks.
#3
Added:
--> @Virtuoso, @bsh1
Someone is changing these to be unmoderated. I accepted this when it was 'moderated' I am certain of that.
Contender
#2
Added:
Reversion to type both figuratively and literally?
#1
#6
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Ew, ew, double ew!
#5
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
I'd like to thank both opponents for this debate.
POOR CONDUCT:
Pro trolled throughout the entire debate by insulting con, not giving any arguments, and swearing.
This obnoxious behavior has made this debate into an incoherent mess.
All other points tied.
#4
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Troll be gone
#3
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
CON concedes that nurturing testicles is bad. so PRO wins
Here we go lets fill this baby up as a mega meme
rf3cwrcf\
\wrc
\]wrcce
cvw'
fevw
vef
qvef
vfe'
vef'
cvef'veqf'
evg'f
qev'f
ve'rf
f'e
vfe'
vef'
vef'
vef'vfe
f
e'vfe
qef'v]
efvq
fev
'efv
efv'
ev'
re'v
fev
#2
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
This debate was completely nuts. I can’t even begin to figure out how to score it. I’m going to award it to RM on the grounds that he sounds 100% less like Type1 than Sparrow does...
#1
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
what....the.....fuck