Instigator / Pro
24
1495
rating
47
debates
48.94%
won
Topic
#1012

somebody please neuter my fucking testicles right out of my fucking nutsack

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
9
15
Better sources
8
12
Better legibility
4
6
Better conduct
3
6

After 6 votes and with 15 points ahead, the winner is...

RationalMadman
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
3
Time for argument
Three days
Max argument characters
30,000
Voting period
One week
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
39
1687
rating
555
debates
68.11%
won
Description

No information

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Ew, ew, double ew!

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

I'd like to thank both opponents for this debate.

POOR CONDUCT:

Pro trolled throughout the entire debate by insulting con, not giving any arguments, and swearing.

This obnoxious behavior has made this debate into an incoherent mess.

All other points tied.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Troll be gone

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

CON concedes that nurturing testicles is bad. so PRO wins

Here we go lets fill this baby up as a mega meme
rf3cwrcf\
\wrc
\]wrcce
cvw'
fevw
vef
qvef
vfe'
vef'
cvef'veqf'
evg'f
qev'f
ve'rf
f'e
vfe'
vef'
vef'
vef'vfe
f
e'vfe
qef'v]
efvq
fev
'efv
efv'
ev'
re'v
fev

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

This debate was completely nuts. I can’t even begin to figure out how to score it. I’m going to award it to RM on the grounds that he sounds 100% less like Type1 than Sparrow does...

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

what....the.....fuck