Instigator / Con
0
1421
rating
18
debates
22.22%
won
Topic
#1088

A total gun ban

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
0
15
Better sources
0
10
Better legibility
0
5
Better conduct
0
5

After 5 votes and with 35 points ahead, the winner is...

Wylted
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
3
Time for argument
One week
Max argument characters
30,000
Voting period
Two weeks
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Pro
35
1387
rating
34
debates
22.06%
won
Description

Round 1: Arguments
Round 2 : Rebuttal of opponent's Round 1
Round 3: Rebuttal of opponent's Round 2

If you break format, it is an auto loss

-->
@bsh1

I just wanted your personal opinion, jerk.

-->
@Wylted

That is a question for the voters, not moderation.

-->
@bsh1

Please address whether my arguments are relevant or not.

-->
@Alec

This debate is basically a full forfeit by Con.

Which would make the healthcare system worse proving my point that it is not abput helping people get better healthcare

-->
@Wylted

Yes, and they love forcing people to do things, slavery and their shitty healthcare

-->
@Dr.Franklin

Anyone studying the history of the party knows why this is the case. It was a party created not for any moral beliefs but merely to pander to enough groups to get power. It was only formed to gain power

oops a double negative

-->
@Wylted

"They pretend like they are pro homosexual but they are supportive of Muslims who disproportionately believe that Gays should be stoned to death and institute the policy when they are the majority of a nation."

I could NOT agree more

They pretend like they are pro homosexual but they are supportive of Muslims who disproportionately believe that Gays should be stoned to death and institute the policy when they are the majority of a nation.

Their politicians make it easier for kids to be removed from their homes and placed in foster care, but they made sure to put me in an abusive foster home. Destroying the argument thay they give two shits about kids. Kids are still to this day abused in the system

-->
@Snoopy

Thank you

Their senators ban guns but have personal security which is armed keeping them safe from the negative effects of their policies. They pretend like they want business out of government but pander to big business by making policies that harm small businesses and increase the market share of their much bigger competitors.

-->
@Alec

They also pretend to care about the poor for example but oppose Laisse Faire capitalism which would almost entirely wipe out poverty. I could go on and on.

-->
@Alec

For example they pretwnd kike the are friendly towards blacks but support abortions that disproportionately kill blacks, support minimum wage increases which disproportionately cause blacks to lose jobs at a higher rate than whites and they support a welfare state incentivizing black couples not to get married and as a result the traditional family structure is less common in black communities causing more black single mothers with their children feeling the effects.

-->
@Wylted

How are liberals generally hypocrites?

-->
@Alec

Typically liberals are hypocrites, so when I debate for a liberal policy I will genuinely act like one.

-->
@Snoopy

Wylted was being a hypocrite. He wanted to horde guns while wanting them banned.

-->
@Alec

Wylted actually did a pretty nice job laying out the framework underlying their reasoning for a total gun ban.

-->
@Alec

This was on topic, but if it wasn't it would be a tied vote, unless conduct is counted.

-->
@David
@bsh1

You guys probably know the Code of Conduct better then I do. If 2 people are debating about guns, person A posts a short argument, person B posts a huge argument off topic, and Person A forfeits. Who wins?

-->
@Snoopy
@Dr.Franklin

This is a full forfeit and you both showed prior interest in the debate. Do you mind giving a quick vote?

-->
@Alec

Okay, I will debate one of the mods on this and have the rule changed. Stuoid rule

-->
@Wylted

The COC states,

"Posting or engaging in commercial advertising anywhere on the site is strictly prohibited."

The advertising is not relevant to the debate.

-->
@Alec

Nothing wrong with advertising if it is relevant to the debate. Also God (me) loves you. Give up your possessions and any female lovers you have to me, and join my family

-->
@Wylted

Your argument is an advertising to join your cult. Not interested, and your argument is largely off topic. Con deserves the win. I am unfriending Pro.

-->
@Wylted

I was trying to trigger libs

-->
@Dr.Franklin

Is it still an easy win after seeing those arguments for pro?

-->
@Snoopy

I never rest. When you see only one set of footprints in the sand, it is because I am carrying you

...and on the seventh source, he rested

-->
@Mharman

Did you prepare for that argument

Good thing I'm not making a leftist argument.

I wanted to argue with him that it wasn't an easy win, but my record doesn't back that up.

easy win for con

easy win for con

-->
@Mharman

Did you forget about me?

-->
@Mharman

Yes, but I have a strong argument

-->
@Wylted

Devil's Advocate?

-->
@David

Interested?

right up my political ally