Junk Food Tax-Yeah A PART3
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 4 votes and with 21 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 4
- Time for argument
- Three days
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- Two weeks
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
Junk Food Tax
If it's practical
And should we implement it
No idea what that was: but con conceded in the final round: which luckily exempts me from having to work it out.
I'm very confused, but using my standard rule for intentional concessions of a debate (arguments to one, conduct to the other).
I am very unsure what a yelp review on plastic even had to do with this debate...
I am also unclear where con plagiarized from (I believe it due to both debaters seeming to agree it happened, so pretty much automatic loss, but it was still weird).
Waiving a round is not in itself bad conduct. Forfeiting involves forcing someone to wait out the clock, waiving isn't comparable on a conduct level... Like forfeiture, it still hurts arguments, as it is dropping every single point for a round. I've seen it done as bad conduct to try Final Round Blitzkriegs, to which I discount their BS and award arguments as if they had nothing, but he conceded instead of trying to make a last minute case which could not be responded to.
Contender conceded in the last Round.
What the fuck.
Good Game Well Played
what?
ggwp
No... You
Stop being salty that you conceded
I didn't plagiarize tho cause you shared the sources w/ me?!
This could've been a very big win by Con, but instead he used points that were either very weak, or false.
i jsut said im forfeiting m8
CONCEDING!!!!!!!!!!!!
Waiving in the middle of a debate is essentially forfeiting, which is bad conduct.
this is for practice only, I actually don't support a Junk Food Tax.