Instigator / Pro
25
1476
rating
16
debates
40.63%
won
Topic
#1112

Rap Battle Part 3

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
12
12
Better sources
6
8
Better legibility
4
4
Better conduct
3
3

After 5 votes and with 2 points ahead, the winner is...

Speedrace
Tags
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
5
Time for argument
Three days
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
One month
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
27
1641
rating
63
debates
65.08%
won
Description

***Rules for my opponent***
Spit 16 bars for each round. It's okay if it is a little more or a little less but try your best to make it at least 16. This rap battle will be judged off of 4 criteria: Rhymes, flow, syllabic pattern, and creativity.
Rhymes - Who had better and more rhymes.
Flow - Who had better flow.
Syllabic pattern - When the syllables are perfectly in sync each line, especially the last word of each bar.
Creativity - Which opponent had more creative bars.

***Rules for voters***
Since this is a rap battle, I'd like to take a different approach and make the judging more accurate and fair. As I've said before, 4 of each criteria will be voted for. You must vote in this fashion below:
Arguments - Better Rhymes.
Sources - Better Flow.
Spelling & Grammar - Better Syllabic pattern.
Conduct - Which opponent was more creative.

If you don't follow the voting method above, your vote will be insufficient.

I will explain my bars in the comments if need be, so the voters (and perhaps my opponent) can understand them.

No forfeits. If you accept the rap battle, then participate.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

CVB for pinkfreud08, offering explanations is not poor conduct, he is explaining the lyrics in the rap.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Pro tried to cheat in the comment section by offering explanations, that's poor conduct!

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Counting the ridiculous vote of clout02.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Countering Ragnar's poor vote because it is not cheating to explain your raps in the comment section. The purpose is for people to understand them as they case their votes.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

As a non-moderated non-debate, I'm just giving a conduct penalty for pro attempting to cheat in the comment section.

I am marking this as sources instead of conduct to honor the request of pro, that interruptions to flow be deducted on sources, to which this conduct violation most closely resembles within the paradigm. ... Additionally (would not be enough for the point by itself), con made good use of a source to bolster his case (it enhanced the burn, even while not needing to be understood in the middle of his argument).