Instigator / Pro
Points: 7

That parents should have the right to implant GPS trackers in their children

Finished

The voting period has ended

After 6 votes the winner is ...
Wylted
Debate details
Publication date
Last update
Category
Education
Time for argument
Twelve hours
Voting system
Open voting
Voting period
One week
Point system
Four points
Rating mode
Rated
Characters per argument
10,000
Contender / Con
Points: 41
Description
No information
Round 1
Forfeited
Published:
1. It is silly because you can literally use their cellphones as Gps trackers. If you are too poor to get your kids a $20 cellphone you probably won't be able to get them a GPS tracker.

2. Often things implanted in the body after a certain amount of time begin to break down. With the device possibly being in the child up to 100 years or more it will likely start to break down and the elements will enter the child's blood stream and become dangerous and unhealthy possibly to the point of killing them.

3. Everyone should have the right to bodily autonomy. This iincludes women who want to murder their unborn child. With society placing a higher value on a woman's bodily autonomy over a black child's life (50% of black children are murdered before they are born) you can rest assured we as a society will value that child's autonomy. If he were idebtical in every way but in the womb, he can go fuck himself, but being not in the womb we care about him so no you can not disrespect his bodily autonomy by sticking a gps tracker in him.

4. Even if bodily autonomy was not important. It seems if somebody is under 18 even if they give consent it is illegal to put stuff inside of them. I learned this the hard way and now am on a sex offenders database. Society does not like us jamming foreign objects into any part of a 12 year old boy with brown hair, green eyes wearing a transformers t-shirt at little league baseball practice. GPS "magic Wand" or otherwise.


Round 2
Forfeited
Published:
New argument. Hitler is bad. He tried to track the Jews and pro is trying to do the same thing as Hitler, making the action unethical.
Round 3
Forfeited
Published:
Full forfeit
Added:
--> @bmdrocks21
You mind giving me a vote on this full forfeit debate real quick please?
Contender
#7
Added:
--> @Wylted
Fair enough. Nice dub
#6
Added:
--> @bmdrocks21
I don't even like the con position but thought other things about this debate made it interesting. I doubt I would do this topic again.
Contender
#5
Added:
--> @Wylted
If this is a full forfeit, I would consider taking up pro's position
#4
Added:
--> @Ragnar
Thank you
Contender
#3
Added:
--> @Wylted
Welcome back!
Your very first point is my total feelings on this debate.
#2
Added:
--> @Shammi
I m con
#1
#6
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
FF but honestly this was really fucking toxic debating style from Wylted and I didn't like the Conduct. Can have the win but really this is too toxic for me to just allow like that with my vote.
#5
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Pro FF the majority of the rounds, that's poor conduct!
#4
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
The opponent forfeited and didn’t provide a counter argument.
#3
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Full Forfeit
#2
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
FF.
#1
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Full forfeit