Instigator / Con
6
1503
rating
26
debates
46.15%
won
Topic
#1124

Theyby

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
0
6
Better sources
2
4
Better legibility
2
2
Better conduct
2
2

After 2 votes and with 8 points ahead, the winner is...

sigmaphil
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
2
Time for argument
Two days
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
One week
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Pro
14
1557
rating
7
debates
71.43%
won
Description

A debate about the theyby, the genderless baby

-->
@sigmaphil

G.G

-->
@Ramshutu

Thanks for your vote!

-->
@kathy_debater

Good point! I appreciate your input!

-->
@WaterPhoenix

*******************************************************************
>Reported Vote: WaterPheonix // Mod action: [Removed]
>Points Awarded: 5 points to con for arguments and sources

>Reason for Decision: Club provides many arguments that Sigmaphil cannot refute such as Club's French people not being able to adjust argument, which Sigmaphil conceded to. Also, Sigmaphil does not provide sufficient refutes to Club's argument of responsibility. Sigmaphil also mostly uses Club's sources for his first argument and uses the Bible and a baby training website in his second argument while Club uses his own sources all the way throughout. I'd like to end this vote by saying that my vote is only a reflection of the debate not a reflection of my personal opinions.

Reason for Mod Action> Arguments and sources are insufficient as per the voting guidelines.

To award arguments, the voter must (1) survey the main arguments and counterarguments in the debate, (2) weigh those arguments and counterarguments against each other, and (3) explain, based on the weighing process, how they reached their decision.

To award sources points, the voter must (1) explain how the debaters' sources impacted the debate, (2) directly assess the strength/utility of at least one source in particular cited in the debate, and (3) explain how and why one debater's use of sources overall was superior to the other's.
*******************************************************************

-->
@sigmaphil

I agree on what you said. There's just one thing. I think parents can call Theybies he or she according to what the child wishes, or according to their sexual organs. Calling the child they is just a bit strange. Moreover, parents can name the kid neutrally, such as Hayden, a name suitable for two genders.

-->
@RationalMadman

Thanks for your vote!

-->
@sigmaphil

I'm sticking with this one. I'm really busy and I can't afford to go for a bigger one.

-->
@Club

Again it doesn't matter to me. Let me know as soon as you can what you want to do. In the meantime, I'm preparing a rebuttal to your first argument, just in case you decline my offer.

-->
@Club

I would not be against forfeiting this debate and restarting it with more arguments. You could send me an invite and I would accept.

-->
@sigmaphil

I assure you this is not a troll debate. I accidentally made it 2 rounds.

-->
@King_8

Yeah, the 2 Rounds definitely caught my eye. Should be a fun one!

-->
@sigmaphil

I think it's a troll debate, plus its only 2 rounds xD

-->
@Club

Let's do it! Although I'm not sure what I'm debating on exactly, lol.

O_o