Instigator / Pro
Points: 21

It's Official! White Males Have Been Labeled As Dometic Terrorists

Finished

The voting period has ended

After 3 votes the winner is ...
mairj23
Debate details
Publication date
Last update
Category
People
Time for argument
One day
Voting system
Open voting
Voting period
Two weeks
Point system
Four points
Rating mode
Rated
Characters per argument
8,000
Required rating
4
Contender / Con
Points: 16
Description
It's only the third day of August and multiple cases of shootings, stabbings and hate crimes have dominated the news. As we all know, the perpetrators are always white people. Yes, criminal behavior takes place in some form or fashion everyday, but the common denominator is always white people. I keep asking in these debates, "why do whites commit so much crime?" It's a question that most people have yet to logically answer.
From the Garlic Festival Shooting to the El Paso Shooting, white people have reverted back to "Dark Age" behavior. It has gotten so bad to where members of congress are labeling white people as Dometic Terrorists, which is a title that's long overdue because whites commit the most crime. These are just some of the high-profile cases so you can only imagine how much crime whites commit that doesn't get any news coverage.
My stance on this matter is that I support congress/politicians' labeling white Americans as domestic terrorists. The evidence is right before our eyes, and I've proved on numerous occasions that these people are criminal minded to the highest degree...If you can prove otherwise, then you're welcome to take this challenge.
Round 1
Published:
Thanks for accepting.

As you can see, this topic keeps coming up because white people can't seem to stop their murderous behavior. As always, reality definitely outweighs any ridiculous line of statistics, especially when the majority of the statistics are being written by the group who's committing the most crimes. In other words, "the proof is always in the pudding."

Yes, my stance on this topic hasn't changed because the circumstances haven't changed. As the old saying goes, "once is an accident, twice is a coincidence and three times is a trend." I know that it's a shameful situation to be a part of the class that's committing the these crimes, & it's at a point to where denying the truth is downright ridiculous. As I stated, these are just some of the high-profile cases. In addition to that, two white guys killed an Italian cop a few days ago if I'm not mistaken...Not to stray too far away from the killing spree, but the photographer of Jon Benet Ramsey was arrested for child porn. 

On another note, rapper ASAP Rocky was attacked overseas by yours truly...yet again. Since the incident was recorded, there's absolutely no argument that you can propagate to defend the "white" attackers...Since this guy isn't a huge name in rap music, then you may not know of him. I'm just solidifying my argument even more.

I strongly believe in the term "fact is stranger than fiction" because you simply can't make this stuff up.

Of course, it would be ridiculous to try and look up every single crime that people commit, but I'm simply proving my point by speaking about what everyone is probably seeing all over the mainstream news. Can you give me a solid answer to why white people are so criminal minded? Would you agree that domestic terrorists deserve the death penalty? 
As I always state in the beginning, this is not an attack on a certain group of people. I'm simply displaying facts.
Forfeited
Round 2
Published:
And that my friends is how you obliterate an opponent.
Published:
You haven't obliterated anyone, mairj. You just set the argument time for one day so no one has a chance to respond to your bullshit. Make a new debate with a week of time for arguments, and then we can debate. 
Round 3
Published:
...
Published:
Nobody has labeled white males as "Dometic Terrorists", whatever that means. You need to actually bring some facts to the table instead of just telling us your opinion. Oh, and three dots do not count as facts, just so you know.
Round 4
Forfeited
Forfeited
Round 5
Forfeited
Forfeited
Added:
--> @Wylted
Yeah, we crackers are a scourge. All we do is rob liquor stores while drinking fried kool aid and collect our food stamps.
#46
Added:
@Wylted
XD
#45
Added:
I hate how white people commit so much crime. I don't feel safe walking through white neighborhoods where there are people openly dealing drugs and lots of gang activity. Even though I am white. I try to stay in the ghetto because it is safer and virtually crime free.
#44
Added:
--> @christopher_best
Yeah, of course you can use it
Contender
#43
Added:
--> @TheAtheist
I found that quite hilarious, I may use it... with credit of course ;)
#42
Added:
--> @mairj23
Quite a lot of mass shooters wear glasses and have poor eyesight. Does that mean we should be wary of people that can't see well?
Contender
#41
Added:
--> @GuitarSlinger
I'm just repeating what's been said by politicians.
My argument was based on the previous mass shootings. Nothing more, nothin less.
Instigator
#40
Added:
--> @mairj23
The title of the debate doesn't explain WHY you think race is to blame (trust me I've read the title multiple times).
So in your opinion, the common thread to all this was that their skin was white, and that this commonality was the reason they did it?
Another common thread was that they all had dark hair. I don't know about you, but this is very telling. I think we should be wary of dark haired folks and perhaps label brunettes as "domestic terrorists".
#39
Added:
--> @bmdrocks21
So, if propaganda gives a one-sided perspective, then is this one-sided perspective more credible than a full perspective?
Instigator
#38
Added:
--> @mairj23
Propaganda isn't necessarily false. It is information that only gives a one-sided perspective on things.
#37
Added:
--> @bmdrocks21
A lie or false statement, whether it's a number or a written statement, can be a form of fraud and manipulation.
Propaganda is the perfect example of manipulation whether it's written or spoken.
Instigator
#36
Added:
--> @GuitarSlinger
What's the title of this debate?
You asked "why do I focus on skin color?" Now explain to me which racial group committed 3-mass shootings in a weeks time?
Class Dismissed...
Instigator
#35
Added:
--> @mairj23
There isn't really a statistic for Franklin to manipulate in terms of you being racist. Either you are or aren't. A lil racism never hurt anyone. ;)
Fraudulent would mean the statistics in question are entirely made up, while manipulated would mean that you try to misrepresent the facts by using different definitions/only look at part of it. Statistics can be fraudulent. I have a little more faith in the FBI than to believe they just randomly made their crime statistics up.
#34
Added:
--> @mairj23
eh, no it's not. You're taking 1 aspect (skin color) and attributing causation to it, without showing or explaining how. My point is there are many other factors that are common to the shooters-- why aren't you addressing those? Why are you choosing to focus on the skin color?
#33
Added:
--> @mairj23
"The title of this debate was quoted by actual politicians"
Who?
Contender
#32
#3
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Conduct: Con has one more forefeit, and given that he didn’t engage in the content, the failure of this debate appears more related to cons action than pros; the content was odious from both, so balanced out.
Arguments: pro offered more of a rant than a justified, warranted position - there is not enough content above that of personal opinion (from either side) to warrant awarding argument points in this case. So arguments are awarded as a tie.
#2
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Poor Conduct:
Con FF the majority of the rounds, that's poor conduct!
Con has also insulted pro in the debate with this attack.
" You haven't obliterated anyone, mairj. You just set the argument time for one day so no one has a chance to respond to your bullshit. "
This is a very condescending comment to make and calling his argument " bullshit " is rather rude and poor conduct.
Because of this, I must award the conduct point to Pro.
Namely, I must also award the convincing arguments point to pro since Con never actually makes an argument and instead relies on insults, leaving Pro's argument uncontested.
I'd also like to bring attention to the fact that Con whines about the response time. Con accepted this debate willingly and if he didn't read the debate details that's his fault, not Pro's.
#1
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
both sides forfieted bot amount of times, and yes three dots equal a forfeit, thus I award a tie becuase niether side was very good