Instigator / Pro
0
1377
rating
62
debates
25.81%
won
Topic
#1260

Jeffrey Epstein is still alive

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Winner
0
3

After 3 votes and with 3 points ahead, the winner is...

Speedrace
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
3
Time for argument
One week
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
Two weeks
Point system
Winner selection
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
3
1641
rating
63
debates
65.08%
won
Description

No information

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Winner
1 point(s)
Reason:

Pros argument is completely unwarranted; and as explained was a non sequitor. Even if I accept as true each of the facts that pro brought - they would not mean that Epstein is Alive.

Pro needs to do far more than he did; to present even basic evidence that the suicide was indeed fake, and that the best explanation of the available evidence was that he wasn’t killed at all, and is actually alive. Pro catastrophically fails to do this.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Winner
1 point(s)
Reason:

A non-sequitur instead of a case. Pro never once offers evidence to even imply of the guy being alive, he merely points to the death being suspicious. Con points this out, thus wins.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Winner
1 point(s)
Reason:

S and G- tie

Conduct-Pro wins because his opponent forfeited round 1. 1 point Pro.

Sources-tie

Arguments- I am to believe the BOP is on Pro as Con stated. Pro gave many arguments that don't necessarily assist his point, his 24 hour surveillance point, or the staged suicide point, Pro doesn't meet the BOP, all he proves is that the cameras footage was lost and that they may have staged a suicide, Pro fails to show how these things prove Epstein is alive, as well as there being . Con convinced me entirely through his rebuttals of these points and how they don't prove pro's point at all. both of these points were won by Con

There is also the fake photos point. I, like the other two points I think Con edged this one, he proved how if they were fake, mistakes we've seen wouldn't have been there as it would be too obvious. This, with the other two points make me believe Con won, with the Bop on Pro, he would have to make solid offensive arguments, Con mitigated all of these with better defensive arguments. Con wins Arguments, 3 points to Con

Con wins 3-1.

Pro didn't do bad in this debate, he just failed to meet the BOP.