The self
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 2 votes and with the same amount of points on both sides...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 4
- Time for argument
- One week
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- One month
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
Either of us may take any position. While in normal debates, the two may take opposing sides, it is fine if we argue for the same idea. The arguments can be analyzed on their own independent of whether we disagree or agree with each other. So I am not concerned with it if we argue for the same side, and thus this is unrated.
The round structure is flexible, but round 1 we can just state our own positions generally without any evidence of logic to support. We can present definitions and acceptance in this round. Every other round we each can use however we want.
K_Michael is correct.
Everyone's a winner!
Honestly, even at a debate website, it's nice to see a little agreement every now and then.
Would like to see you debate someone with an opposing view. I am not really confident in my debating skills otherwise I would do it myself
Enjoyed you two's conversation
Would like to see what you think about my conjectures in my argument
If that's the case you have no issues with what I've argued, as I had said in the description, you can argue for the same position in a different way. It doesn't exactly weigh on us as debater for whether we are good at debating if we have opposing positions. Feel free to argue for the same position with different arguments.
Ah, I forgot to mention HOW we control neurotransmission. Of course even today we can do that with magnets, psychiatric medication, electric-shock therapy, etc. I'll make mention of that in the next round. If we controlled two identical twins' neurotransmission completely(of course, we need to finish mapping out the brain), then I see no reason to believe they would suddenly be controlled by the same self, if "the self" is merely the matter that forms the body and brain + neurotransmissions as those more materialist people would claim.
I did that and nothing. Happened. See my most recent debates.
I don't see anything prohibiting it. Guess I could do it then.
Is that allowed to create a second debate about the same exact thing? I could check through the rules and code of conduct.
Can you make a copy of this so I can accept?
Thanks if you do.