Nordic model
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 7 votes and with 17 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 5
- Time for argument
- Two days
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- One week
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
in the future everyone will live in iceland
- for each person; in relation to people taken individually."the state had fewer banks per capita than elsewhere" GNP per Capita. Gross national product (GNP) per capita is the dollar value of a country's final output of goods and services in a year, divided by its population. It reflects the average income of a country's citizens.
Country
Quality of Life Index
1
Denmark
196.47
2
Switzerland
196.08
3
Finland
195.06
4
Australia
189.73
per capita what does per capita mean?per cap·i·ta/pər ˈkapədə/adverb & adjective
for each person; in relation to people taken individually."the state had fewer banks per capita than elsewhere" GNP per Capita. Gross national product (GNP) per capita is the dollar value of a country's final output of goods and services in a year, divided by its population. It reflects the average income of a country's citizens.GNP per Capita - Unesco Etxea
Norway/GNI per capita63,530 PPP dollars (2017)19901995200020052010201580,00080,00060,00060,00040,00040,00020,00020,00000•Norway63,530 PPP dollarsUnited States/GNI per capita60,200 PPP dollars (2017) Texas/GDP per capita$53,795 Alaska/GDP per capita$63,971Massachusetts/GDP per capita$65,545 as we see if you divide by people the nordic model out performs in standard of living and quality of life both
Forfeiture
Pro could not even explain what GNI or PPP stands for, while referencing them from a source. This blunder of source spam tips the balance on sources to con for using pro's own source to undermine has case potentially being valid. Pro actively chose to drop everything (even in the one round he posted something), leaving this a no contest as con proved with GPD as a metric that the USA's model does better, and there were no other metrics for comparison introduced.
Conduct for FF.
.6 F
Half forfeit. How rude!
A lot of forfeiture from pro
Neither side convinced me
Forfeit
This debate is a full forfeit, thus waterphoenix vote is not moderated
This debate is a full forfeit, thus waterphoenix vote is not moderated
Thanks.
the black book of communism has been debunked those absurd numbers are inflated, aand to suggest the nordic model is like communism is an association falacy, and quite frankly pathetic
nordic nations are the MOST COMPETTIVE that is what surprises those that study them, its like the bumble bee that should not be able to fly, but does
Competitive as in the capitalist aspects of the system. I don't think I need to go that deep given my opponent but I might.
Nordic countries aren't competitive? Interesting. I'm guessing you will go more into that in the debate?
If it works then I am for it. Since the Nordic countries are not really competitive with global markets I don't care.
I thought that in previous discussions you said you were for it. Perhaps not. If you actually are against it, I am excited to see your arguments. Good luck!
I guess unless of course the person I am facing actually can make a good argument. I have never seen it.
I don't have to be for the nordic model to be on the left.
I was pretending you came to the other side. Another easy dub, my good sir?
What?
Et tu, Omar?
Welcome. Nice topic.