Instigator / Pro
4
1377
rating
62
debates
25.81%
won
Topic
#1447

Metal Healing Properties

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
0
3
Better sources
2
2
Better legibility
1
1
Better conduct
1
0

After 1 vote and with 2 points ahead, the winner is...

Discipulus_Didicit
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
5
Time for argument
Two weeks
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
One month
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
6
1596
rating
9
debates
88.89%
won
Description

"Pro has to prove it is more likely that God is the reason these positive effects exist.

Con has to prove these positive effects are more likely to be natural."

Burden of proof split 50/50

-->
@Barney

Yea giving pro points for conduct is definitely fair. I kinda got frustrated at responding to arguments that started devolving into blocks of gibberish text and never really cared about my leaderboard position so just sort of forgot this debate even existed.

As always thank you for taking the time to read the debate and leave a vote.

How do you still not know what silver is even after I explained it so clearly?

About 5.5 days left

no i forgot

Are you forfeiting because you want that to be the end of the debate like we discussed? If yes then I will put "Agreed to end the debate here, please disregard pros forfeit and any further arguments by pro or myself. See comments for details." as my next round.

Voters are not going to count any arguments made in the comments section so go ahead and just say it in the debate section. Bring up something good and I promise to devote more than a half hour to my next round.

"Silver has a remarkable ability to selectively destroy pathogenic bacteria while not causing harm to healthy probiotic bacteria. This webpage presents data showing"

https://www.silverhealthinstitute.com/silver-bacteria/

-->
@Discipulus_Didicit

" Sovereign Silver ONLY kills the BAD bacteria and strengthens the good!"

http://win-edge.com/Sovereign_Silver.html

"How can silver choose to kill bad germs but strengthens the good germs?"

It doesn't. You have done nothing to demonstrate that it does other than link to ads for 'jesus juice' and voters are going to notice this. Please try harder so I don't get bored and forget this debate exists.

-->
@Discipulus_Didicit

This is a debate not an ad page.Idk why your not understanding my argument.I thought it was pretty clear and used common sense.

How can a rock choose to hit a bad person but not a good person.The answer is the one who throws it made the choice between good and bad not the rock

How can silver choose to kill bad germs but strengthens the good germs.The answer is the one who created it made the choice between good and bad Not the silver

only an intelligent being can make a choice.Both example are written exactly the same.in the hope's you catch on to my logic

Okay I seriously want to know... is this a debate or an ad page? because you have mostly just been advertising for a bunch of random products that have been various levels of pseudo scientific in nature.

I forgot the olive oil source
https://www.medicaldaily.com/olive-oil-compound-kills-cancer-cells-less-hour-all-powerful-oleocanthal-322904

Shiiiiiiiit I forgot to link the paper

https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2014/tb/c3tb21569e#!divAbstract

Like I said it's up to you when you want to end it bud. You really haven't done much so far other than restate the resolution though...

-->
@Discipulus_Didicit

once we get to round 3 then we can decide if we want to go further. I do not want you to get the wrong idea. 5 rounds to get my idea through might be needed

I am putting together my round one now.

Five rounds seems a bit long for this debate but I am willing if that is really what you want. If at any point you wish for the debate to be shorter I am fine with that though. For example if you decide after three rounds that we have talked enough then you can just put for round four and five "Cutting the debate short as suggested by my opponent in the comments" or something like that and I will just put "Agreed" in my round four and five, or at any other point if you wish.

But like I said I am willing to slog through five whole rounds... just seems like that will be more than necessary.

I'm working 60 hours this week so it may be a few days before my round one is complete. I will do so though, thanks in advance for your patience.

-->
@Discipulus_Didicit

Good luck

Agreed. I show that it is more likely that such effects do not require a supernatural intelligence to be behind them.

-->
@Discipulus_Didicit

Just so were are clear you are telling me how it formed naturally not how it works.

For example lets say a crystal protects you from wireless signals. I say god did this.And you say no the rock sends off magnetic field that blocks WiFi signals. in this example you did not prove that it formed naturally but merely told me how the rock works.

-->
@Discipulus_Didicit

Alright

I reccomend you use part of round one to explain to the audience just what healing properties you are referring to. I know what you mean because I was on the thread that started this debate and you talked about it there but not everyone voting on this debate will have seen that thread.

You don't have to do this but I recommend it because it will help your case by reducing confusion among the voters, thus limiting the possibility of me using some unforeseen technicality to steal a win.