Instigator
Points: 11

I demand the right to vote, i feel like a segregated negro here!!!

Finished

The voting period has ended

After 3 votes the winner is ...
NotClub
Debate details
Publication date
Last update
Category
Philosophy
Time for argument
One day
Voting system
Open voting
Voting period
One week
Point system
Four points
Rating mode
Rated
Characters per argument
10,000
Contender
Points: 21
Description
youve mede me a second class citizen and i wont stand for that let me vote [email protected]!
Round 1
Published:
I am a man! i got rights dammit!
Published:
They aren't rights, they're privileges. You lost the privileges yourself.  You have no right to blame the moderators.

My opponent failed to prove that he feels like a "segregated n*gro."

Round 2
Published:
my feelings are self evident they dont have to be  proven, we hold these truths to be self evident that all men are created eqqual and endowed with certain inalienable rights so to say we dont hav rights is unamerican
Published:
to say we dont hav rights is unamerican
(S&G ERROR)
You do have rights on the site, you can comment, pm, and create debates. But you don't have the privilege to vote yet, because you're basically trolling most of your debates. And why are you so sure this is American? Just because you are logging in from America, doesn't mean that the site is American. 

my feelings are self evident they dont have to be  proven,
(ANOTHER S&G ERROR)
In some cases, people lie about how they feel to avoid being an idiot or something. You have to prove that you're not lying. Feelings are often lied about, and you cannot prove in any way that you feel like a "segregated negro." 



VOTERS:
My opponent has made many S&G errors, which almost make the arguments unreadable. His main point is some fluff about how the site is bad because America said so, and completely ignored the fact THAT HE DOES HAVE RIGHTS. In short, he's just another troll trying to grasp at people's attention. Vote Con!


Note to Bill: This isn't DDO, don't post stupid things about the site in the debates section, post it in the forums.

Round 3
Published:
i'm going to hold my breath and poop in my pants and then light your cat on fire if you dont let me vote! dont make me kiss your grandma with tongue
Published:
i'm going to hold my breath and poop in my pants and then light your cat on fire if you dont let me vote! dont make me kiss your grandma with tongue
Conduct and S&G here. Your only argument is an insult to the moderation.
VOTE CON
Added:
What the hell happened here
#7
Added:
Easy win for con...
#6
Added:
--> @PressF4Respect
okay i did now what? how do i get my votes?
Instigator
#5
Added:
--> @billbatard
This is what the CoC says:
"In order for users to be eligible to vote on debates, user's current accounts must reflect that they have read the site's COC AND either completed at least 2 non-troll debates without any forfeits or posted 100 forum posts."
#4
Added:
--> @PressF4Respect
honest?
Instigator
#3
Added:
--> @billbatard
Just make 100 forum posts.
Easy.
#2
Added:
Of the 15 Open challenges- 11 are instigated by billbatard
Of the 47 debates in progress- 13 are being debated by billbatard
Of the 53 debates in voting- 17 are argued by billbatard
That is an awful lot of hoo haw
#1
#3
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
just look at pros points
#2
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
I don't even want to address this horrid of a resolution, but I will say significantly neither advanced their BoP toward it.
S&G did come up as an argument, which pro dropped, all but conceding that his S&G was too horrible for his ideas to be understood. However, I think I get the gist of pro's points (as strange as they were).
Conduct: Threatening to murder a cat.
#1
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Not one side really offered an in depth argument, no extensive dialogue took place. As a result, arguments must be tied.
S and G
Errors from Pro.
"my feelings are self evident they dont have to be proven, we hold these truths to be self evident that all men are created eqqual and endowed with certain inalienable rights so to say we dont hav rights is unamerican."
"i'm going to hold my breath and poop in my pants and then light your cat on fire if you dont let me vote! dont make me kiss your grandma with tongue."
So most of the time I can presume what Pro is referring to, like equal being spelt eqqual, same thing with have bein spelt hav. But, this kills the flow of the debate, I could work through Cons text effortlessly, but Pro's points continuously forced me to reread over a missed comma, or stop/stutter for a second to establish what he really meant by hav or eqqual.
Conduct
i'm going to hold my breath and poop in my pants and then light your cat on fire if you dont let me vote! dont make me kiss your grandma with tongue.
This is either a violent threat to Con or the moderation team, either way it is unacceptable to threaten somebodies cat, even if it was simply a joke it isn't an excuse to potentially make a user fear for their loved and appreciated pet.