Instigator / Pro
11
1294
rating
75
debates
18.0%
won
Topic
#1465

I demand the right to vote, i feel like a segregated negro here!!!

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
6
9
Better sources
4
6
Better legibility
1
3
Better conduct
0
3

After 3 votes and with 10 points ahead, the winner is...

NotClub
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
3
Time for argument
One day
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
One week
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
21
1488
rating
4
debates
37.5%
won
Description

youve mede me a second class citizen and i wont stand for that let me vote dammit@!

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

just look at pros points

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

I don't even want to address this horrid of a resolution, but I will say significantly neither advanced their BoP toward it.

S&G did come up as an argument, which pro dropped, all but conceding that his S&G was too horrible for his ideas to be understood. However, I think I get the gist of pro's points (as strange as they were).

Conduct: Threatening to murder a cat.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Not one side really offered an in depth argument, no extensive dialogue took place. As a result, arguments must be tied.

S and G

Errors from Pro.

"my feelings are self evident they dont have to be proven, we hold these truths to be self evident that all men are created eqqual and endowed with certain inalienable rights so to say we dont hav rights is unamerican."

"i'm going to hold my breath and poop in my pants and then light your cat on fire if you dont let me vote! dont make me kiss your grandma with tongue."

So most of the time I can presume what Pro is referring to, like equal being spelt eqqual, same thing with have bein spelt hav. But, this kills the flow of the debate, I could work through Cons text effortlessly, but Pro's points continuously forced me to reread over a missed comma, or stop/stutter for a second to establish what he really meant by hav or eqqual.

Conduct

i'm going to hold my breath and poop in my pants and then light your cat on fire if you dont let me vote! dont make me kiss your grandma with tongue.

This is either a violent threat to Con or the moderation team, either way it is unacceptable to threaten somebodies cat, even if it was simply a joke it isn't an excuse to potentially make a user fear for their loved and appreciated pet.