Instigator / Pro
35
1490
rating
1
debates
0.0%
won
Topic
#148

Fork VS spoon

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
6
36
Better sources
20
24
Better legibility
7
12
Better conduct
2
12

After 12 votes and with 49 points ahead, the winner is...

RationalMadman
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
5
Time for argument
Three days
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
One month
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
84
1687
rating
555
debates
68.11%
won
Description

No information

Epic Rap Battles of History: Fork vs. Spoon (Interrupted by third party Spork)

-->
@Ramshutu

*******************************************************************
>Reported Vote: Ramshutu // Mod action: Not Removed

>Points Awarded: 7 points to Con
>Reason for Decision: Full forfeit

>Reason for Mod Action: Full forfeit debates are not moderated unless they vote for the forfeiting side, which they did not do.
************************************************************************

-->
@zedvictor4

*******************************************************************
>Reported Vote: Zedvictor4 // Mod action: Not Removed

>Points Awarded: 5 points to Con for arguments, S/G, and conduct

>Reason for Decision: At least Con debated, albeit limitedly.

>Reason for Mod Action: This debate is a full forfeit. FF debates are not moderated unless the voter voted for the conceding side. This did not occur, so this vote is not actionable.
************************************************************************

-->
@Earth

*******************************************************************
>Reported Vote: Earth // Mod action: Not Removed

>Points Awarded: 1 point to Con for conduct

>Reason for Decision: kfc kfc nac pac

>Reason for Mod Action: This debate is a full forfeit. FF debates are not moderated unless the voter voted for the conceding side. This did not occur, so this vote is not actionable.
************************************************************************

-->
@David

*******************************************************************
>Reported Vote: Virtuoso // Mod action: Not Removed

>Points Awarded: 7 points to Con

>Reason for Decision: Full forfeit

>Reason for Mod Action: This debate is a full forfeit. FF debates are not moderated unless the voter voted for the conceding side. This did not occur, so this vote is not actionable.
************************************************************************

-->
@TheGreatSeal

*******************************************************************
>Reported Vote: TheGreatSeal // Mod action: Not Removed

>Points Awarded: 5 points to Con for arguments, sources, and conduct

>Reason for Decision: Full Forfeit.

>Reason for Mod Action: This debate is a full forfeit. FF debates are no moderated unless the voter voted for the conceding side. This did not occur, so this vote is not actionable.
************************************************************************

-->
@Vader

*******************************************************************
>Reported Vote: SupaDudz // Mod action: Not Removed

>Points Awarded: 3 points to Con for arguments

>Reason for Decision: full forfeit reee

>Reason for Mod Action: This debate is a full forfeit. FF debates are no moderated unless the voter voted for the conceding side. This did not occur, so this vote is not actionable.
************************************************************************

I would have to give the first round to Edenison. RM used a fork like implement (a point) to make his first argument by his own admission. It doesn't look very good for you when you use a fork to type while arguing that forks are inferior.