Instigator / Pro
0
1294
rating
75
debates
18.0%
won
Topic

The world would be better off without distinct racial ethnic or religious groups

Status
Finished

All stages have been completed. The voting points distribution and the result are presented below.

Voting points
0
2

With 2 votes and 2 points ahead, the winner is ...

Ramshutu
Parameters
More details
Publication date
Last update date
Category
People
Time for argument
Twelve hours
Voting system
Open voting
Voting period
One week
Point system
Winner selection
Rating mode
Rated
Characters per argument
1,000
Required rating
1
Contender / Con
2
1758
rating
42
debates
94.05%
won
Description
~ 404 / 5,000

No religion, no races , no distinct ethnic groups, no reason to hate the "other' because we will all be the same a mixture of the distinct waring tribes that are now on the verge of destroying our world the only superior race is a mixed race the only true religion is no religion , we should probably allow the Italians to remain a distinct ethnic group , someone has to direct our movies and make pizza

Added:
--> @Ramshutu

I see. I don't believe they will be removed since they were posted before the ban. His account giving out free wins has really distorted the leaderboard.

Added:
Contender
--> @bmdrocks21

I’m actually hoping they get deleted (I asked the question when I accepted - imo they’re kinda spam anyway), as I don’t think 12 debates in challenge period that will be auto forfeited as you say is a bit much for throwing out a lot of free wins. If they don’t, I took a handful couple of the shorter ones, so if they aren't removed; I’m at least not at a disadvantage (hence why I didn’t accept them all). I’ll only get bout 3 points per win; and I haven’t milked Bill for free points thus far - but I still mostly agree that these should be removed.

Added:
--> @Ramshutu

Accepting a debate that is an auto full forfeit because of a ban? That's poor conduct....

Added:

Time for argument 12 hours! Screw that.

Added:

*slow claps*