Ragnar has blocked me he should not be allowed to vote on my debates!
All stages have been completed. The voting points distribution and the result are presented below.
With 6 votes and 6 points ahead, the winner is ...
- Publication date
- Last update date
- Time for argument
- Twelve hours
- Voting system
- Open voting
- Voting period
- One week
- Point system
- Winner selection
- Rating mode
- Characters per argument
Ragnar should be banned from this [email protected]! he has violated my personal safe spaces! i protest!
Both sides forfeited, but Con was the only side that offered any form of argument relevant to the debate.
Although both sides forfeited once, Pro's only argument was barely related to the topic at hand, while Con actually made a valid point, which was dropped by pro.
Really weird debate, both forfeited 1 time so conduct is tied. Con does make a point about Ragnar having the right to vote, and this is dropped by pro. Pro merely points to something about Charles Dickens, entirely irrelevant to the resolution.
Both forfeited one round.
Con provides an actual, fact-based argument (regarding Ragnar's right to vote).
Pro simply talks about a quote by Charles Dickens calling the law an a**. It isn't really a quality argument. I struggle to find any relevance of this to the debate.
Both forfeited, but con was theo only one to present a real argument. Con's main argument is that Ragnar still has the right to vote, which he does. Pro never makes an argument and the only thing he responds with is Charles Dickens, which makes absolutely no senes in this context.