Instigator / Pro
0
1294
rating
75
debates
18.0%
won
Topic

Ragnar has blocked me he should not be allowed to vote on my debates!

Status
Finished

All stages have been completed. The voting points distribution and the result are presented below.

Voting points
0
6

With 6 votes and 6 points ahead, the winner is ...

RationalMadman
Parameters
More details
Publication date
Last update date
Category
People
Time for argument
Twelve hours
Voting system
Open voting
Voting period
One week
Point system
Winner selection
Rating mode
Rated
Characters per argument
10,000
Contender / Con
6
1614
rating
350
debates
65.43%
won
Description
~ 93 / 5,000

Ragnar should be banned from this [email protected]! he has violated my personal safe spaces! i protest!

Added:
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Winner
1 point(s)
Reason:

Both sides forfeited, but Con was the only side that offered any form of argument relevant to the debate.

Added:
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Winner
1 point(s)
Reason:

rfdic

Added:
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Winner
1 point(s)
Reason:

Although both sides forfeited once, Pro's only argument was barely related to the topic at hand, while Con actually made a valid point, which was dropped by pro.

Added:
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Winner
1 point(s)
Reason:

Really weird debate, both forfeited 1 time so conduct is tied. Con does make a point about Ragnar having the right to vote, and this is dropped by pro. Pro merely points to something about Charles Dickens, entirely irrelevant to the resolution.

Added:
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Winner
1 point(s)
Reason:

Both forfeited one round.

Con provides an actual, fact-based argument (regarding Ragnar's right to vote).

Pro simply talks about a quote by Charles Dickens calling the law an a**. It isn't really a quality argument. I struggle to find any relevance of this to the debate.

Added:
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Winner
1 point(s)
Reason:

Both forfeited, but con was theo only one to present a real argument. Con's main argument is that Ragnar still has the right to vote, which he does. Pro never makes an argument and the only thing he responds with is Charles Dickens, which makes absolutely no senes in this context.