Instigator / Pro
Points: 0

It is not enough to quote data it must be correctly interpreted, often data can by misleading for many reasons

Finished

The voting period has ended

After 2 votes the winner is ...
RationalMadman
Debate details
Publication date
Last update
Category
Science
Time for argument
Two days
Voting system
Open voting
Voting period
One week
Point system
Winner selection
Rating mode
Rated
Characters per argument
10,000
Required rating
1
Contender / Con
Points: 2
Description
The average person is to stupid to fact check and think critically and often they are swayed by bogus studies https://dispellingthemythukvsusguns.wordpress.com/
Round 1
Forfeited
Published:
It is not enough to quote data it must be correctly interpreted, often data can by misleading for many reasons
I interpret this as correct... but the data is not there...

Where is the data Pro? Can you quote it?...

I was wrong to interpret it as correct, for the data itself doesn't exist to be interpreted, it's just a string of words that we have assigned meaning from our flawed subjective minds.

Round 2
Forfeited
Published:
The data supporting Pro need only be quoted and Pro will win.
Round 3
Forfeited
Published:
Slap that booty.
Added:
Bonus points to this debate for irony.
#2
Added:
Yeah, man. Like when people say illegal immigrants are good for our economy because they make tomatoes slightly cheaper, but then never mention the billions of dollars they use up in welfare programs every year.
#1
#2
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Winner 1 point
Reason:
Full forfeit
#1
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Winner 1 point
Reason:
FF