Instigator / Pro
Points: 14

Who wins the debate on whether or not President Trump Should be re-elected?

Voting

The participant who scores the most points is declared the winner

The voting period will end in:
00:00:00:00
Debate details
Publication date
Last update
Category
Politics
Time for argument
Two days
Voting system
Open voting
Voting period
One month
Point system
Four points
Rating mode
Rated
Characters per argument
3,000
Contender / Con
Points: 14
Description
Virtuoso and I had a debate on whether or not "President Donald Trump should not be re-elected in 2020" but nobody voted.
https://www.debateart.com/debates/1434/president-donald-trump-should-not-be-re-elected-in-2020
I can't have a perfectly good debate going to waste, though. So I want this debate to be used to vote the winner of that debate.
There will be a voting period of one month as opposed to 2 weeks, so people will have more time to survey the arguments and whatnot.
Round 1
Published:
We put all that time and effort into our debate and nobody voted. That's not right.
Published:
agreed
Added:
--> @Trent0405
*******************************************************************
>Reported Vote:Trent0405 // Mod action: [not Removed]
>Points Awarded: Tue
>Reason for Decision:
Not one argument was presented for or against con or pro winning the debate in question. Pro merely argues the debate was a tie which isn't right, con just agrees.
Reason for Mod Action> This vote is sufficient - it references the content of the debate and whilst it does not seem to take into consideration the debate description - such descriptions are not enforced by moderation.
*******************************************************************
#8
Added:
--> @Ramshutu
I disagree, works like a charm
#7
Added:
--> @Dr.Franklin
You don’t have to bed me in order to vote..
#6
Added:
the wont let me vote its like jim crow
#5
Added:
--> @RationalMadman
Posting or bumping spam threads, comments, or replies is prohibited. Spam is any content which is nonsensical or excessively repetitive.
clearly this does not meet the COC's definition of spam.
Contender
#4
Added:
--> @RationalMadman, @Trent0405
This clearly is not spam. This is also not a debate where we argue who won the debate or who did not win the debate. It's clearly set up so we can get votes on the original debate.
Contender
#3
Added:
--> @RationalMadman
What's debate spam?
Instigator
#2
Added:
How is this not debate spam?
#1
#2
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
What a fucking terrible debate, make a forum post or just bed ramshustu or Ragnar to do it.
#1
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Not one argument was presented for or against con or pro winning the debate in question. Pro merely argues the debate was a tie which isn't right, con just agrees.