Instigator / Pro
Points: 42

Andrew Yang for 2020

Voting

The participant who scores the most points is declared the winner

The voting period will end in:
00:00:00:00
Debate details
Publication date
Last update
Category
Politics
Time for argument
Two days
Voting system
Open voting
Voting period
One week
Point system
Four points
Rating mode
Rated
Characters per argument
100
Contender / Con
Points: 3
Description
Andrew Yang is the best candidate for 2020. While his lack of political experience may be one of his downfalls, his innovative ideas and a variant perspective on matters makes up for that greatly.
Oh, and you only have one sentence per round to say what you want.
Round 1
Published:
UBI - benefit economy. Medicare plan - help millions of lives.

US eco.'s bad. AY can fix it.
Published:
Round 2
Published:
10% VAT pays for it, and saved money from social expenses.

Better education and immigration.
Forfeited
Round 3
Published:
Thinks economically, new solutions to problems. Politicians fail to do so.

Openly express his family.
Forfeited
Added:
--> @bmdrocks21
Ha, lol!
Instigator
#6
Added:
--> @DynamicSquid
All I can think of looking at this debate is "Orange man bad" lmao.
#5
Added:
--> @bmdrocks21, @PaulVerliane
bmd, lol. I wanted too see how a one sentence debate would play out.
Paul, glad you like him. Just curious, if not Yang, then who else would win?
Instigator
#4
Added:
Short enough. Maybe I'll vote lol.
#3
Added:
asians are wicked smart with money and yang is a successful businessman
#2
Added:
wheres my check i'll vote for chop suey
#1
#6
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Full forfeit
#5
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
asains are smart asian business men are double smart
#4
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Full Forfeit
#3
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
100 might be too few, but I like how quick and concise it was...
And yeah, FF.
#2
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Concession.
r/the_yangbang
#1
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Full Forfeit.