Instigator / Pro
9
1466
rating
2
debates
0.0%
won
Topic

Abiogenesis

Status
Finished

All stages have been completed. The voting points distribution and the result are presented below.

Arguments points
3
12
Sources points
4
8
Spelling and grammar points
1
4
Conduct points
1
4

With 4 votes and 19 points ahead, the winner is ...

GeneralGrant
Parameters
More details
Publication date
Last update date
Category
Science
Time for argument
Two weeks
Voting system
Open voting
Voting period
One week
Point system
Four points
Rating mode
Rated
Characters per argument
20,000
Required rating
1
Contender / Con
28
1395
rating
22
debates
20.45%
won
Description
~ 50 / 5,000

Abiogenesis is possible and supported by evidence.

Added:
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better spelling and grammar
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

full forfeit

Added:
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better spelling and grammar
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Full forfeit.

Added:
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better spelling and grammar
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Full forfeit from Pro. I'm counting Con's statement that "life cannot arise from non-life" as a rudimentary argument that wasn't able to develop because of Pro's full forfeit. Thus, overall, arguments goes to Con.

Added:
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better spelling and grammar
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Forfeiture.