Instigator / Pro
Points: 9

Abiogenesis

Finished

The voting period has ended

After 4 votes the winner is ...
GeneralGrant
Debate details
Publication date
Last update
Category
Science
Time for argument
Two weeks
Voting system
Open voting
Voting period
One week
Point system
Four points
Rating mode
Rated
Characters per argument
20,000
Required rating
1
Contender / Con
Points: 28
Description
Abiogenesis is possible and supported by evidence.
Round 1
Forfeited
Published:
forfeit
Round 2
Forfeited
Forfeited
Round 3
Forfeited
Forfeited
Round 4
Forfeited
Published:
Life cannot arise from non-life.
Round 5
Forfeited
Published:
I rest my case.
Added:
--> @GeneralGrant
You need to submit at least one point to make your case, or this debate will be an FF on both sides. It really doesn't matter what argument you use. Just write something so we can give you argument points.
#9
Added:
--> @Dr.Franklin
oh yeah, I had almost forgotten about good ol' backwardseden. I guess I just blocked out all of the times I got called a "pus filled dung bile cotton faced teeny bopper."
#8
Added:
not by real science no no
#7
Added:
--> @WhoPutYouOnThePlanet
Nah that was justbackwardseden
#6
Added:
--> @Dr.Franklin
Likewise...
Also the fact that you made "supposed" enemy's on debate.org probably had something to do with your clearly inappropriate and vulgar behavior/language towards others on the site.
Instigator
#5
Added:
another one from DDO
**sigh**
#4
Added:
--> @OoDart
Is creation from a supreme being of some sort supported by empirical evidence? No, so no it doesn't count.
--> @zedivictor4
It was more of an opening rather then an actual argument, so i wouldn't judge yet based off that alone.
Instigator
#3
Added:
--> @WhoPutYouOnThePlanet
Does creation from a Supreme Being of some sort count as abiogenesis?
#2
Added:
--> @WhoPutYouOnThePlanet
"Abiogenesis is possible and supported by evidence."
Well. That's a self supporting truism in a nutshell if ever I saw one.
It's like saying, frying pans are possible and supported by evidence.
Not a great deal of science required.
#1
#4
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
full forfeit
#3
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Full forfeit.
#2
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Full forfeit from Pro. I'm counting Con's statement that "life cannot arise from non-life" as a rudimentary argument that wasn't able to develop because of Pro's full forfeit. Thus, overall, arguments goes to Con.
#1
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Forfeiture.