Instigator / Pro

Abiogenesis

Debating

Waiting for instigator's argument

The round will be automatically forfeited in:
00:00:00:00
Debate details
Publication date
Last update
Category
Science
Time for argument
Two weeks
Voting system
Open voting
Voting period
One week
Point system
Four points
Rating mode
Rated
Characters per argument
20,000
Required rating
1
Contender / Con
Description
Abiogenesis is possible and supported by evidence.
Round 1
Not published yet
Not published yet
Round 2
Not published yet
Not published yet
Round 3
Not published yet
Not published yet
Round 4
Not published yet
Not published yet
Round 5
Not published yet
Not published yet
Added:
not by real science no no
#7
Added:
--> @WhoPutYouOnThePlanet
Nah that was justbackwardseden
#6
Added:
--> @Dr.Franklin
Likewise...
Also the fact that you made "supposed" enemy's on debate.org probably had something to do with your clearly inappropriate and vulgar behavior/language towards others on the site.
Instigator
#5
Added:
another one from DDO
**sigh**
#4
Added:
--> @OoDart
Is creation from a supreme being of some sort supported by empirical evidence? No, so no it doesn't count.
--> @zedivictor4
It was more of an opening rather then an actual argument, so i wouldn't judge yet based off that alone.
Instigator
#3
Added:
--> @WhoPutYouOnThePlanet
Does creation from a Supreme Being of some sort count as abiogenesis?
#2
Added:
--> @WhoPutYouOnThePlanet
"Abiogenesis is possible and supported by evidence."
Well. That's a self supporting truism in a nutshell if ever I saw one.
It's like saying, frying pans are possible and supported by evidence.
Not a great deal of science required.
#1
No votes yet