Instigator / Pro
Points: 50

Debateart is lazy

Voting

The participant who scores the most points is declared the winner

The voting period will end in:
00:00:00:00
Debate details
Publication date
Last update
Category
Science
Time for argument
Two days
Voting system
Open voting
Voting period
Six months
Point system
Four points
Rating mode
Rated
Characters per argument
10,000
Required rating
1
Contender / Con
Points: 98
Description
If you tried to vote on debate.org it wouldn't let you and list the requirements, here it lets you vote anyway and then mods come and remove your votes because you didn't follow the guidelines, talk about a lazy downgrade much.
Round 1
Forfeited
Published:
Understand that if you type a single word here, you will only look worse when I decimate your argumetns.
Round 2
Published:
you mean *arguments*
Published:
Don't
Round 3
Published:
Pointless additional context. 
Published:
Put forth a single contructive argument.
Round 4
Published:
Likewise
Published:
Burden of proof is on you to prove that DART is lazy.
Round 5
Forfeited
Published:
Laziness is in the eye of the beholder.
Added:
--> @Lazarous
I guess I was wrong. I spoke to another mod. You can repost it.
#12
Added:
--> @RationalMadman, @Lazarous
Yeah, I'm pretty sure they need to be completed, but I was going to ask him anyway
#11
Added:
--> @Lazarous
Ask that question to Ragnar, you'll be asking who Blamonkey is about to ask. Just a streetsmart tip from a local Guru.
Contender
#10
Added:
--> @blamonkey
I do have two completed debates. Do I actually have to wait for voting to complete on my second debate to qualify?
#9
Added:
--> @Lazarous
*******************************************************************
>Reported Vote: Lazorous // Mod action: [Removed]
>Points Awarded: 4 to Con
>Reason for Decision: "I would have liked to see even one decent argument from either side. I had little to vote on besides two forfeitures from Pro."
>Reason for Mod Action: The user is ineligible to vote per the Voting Guidelines. To vote, a user must have either 2 finished debates or 100 forum posts. The following URL will take you to the CoC and Voting Guidelines which I recommend skimming.
https://info.debateart.com/statements/code-of-conduct#voter-eligibility
************************************************************************
#8
Added:
--> @DebateArt.com
As much as i adore your excuses and passive aggressive insults, you are now well aware of this problem and should take action to sort it out, if you end up refusing to do this because it was addressed specifically here then you clearly dont care about these issues.
Instigator
#7
Added:
they dont let me vote
#6
Added:
--> @WhoPutYouOnThePlanet
Do you know how many other simple and not so much inconveniences have been resolved during all this time? But I guess you haven't taken those into consideration, you just found one issue to complain about and without properly bringing it to attention, decided to call people lazy.
I didn't mean that it was a fancy feature, what I was trying to point out is that we have lots of issues, small and big and they take time to resolve considering that it's a hobby project and we don't have a team of devs here. And before something is resolved, it has to be brought to attention first and quite often discussed with the community, which hasn't been done. And frankly, before you "call things as you see them", you gotta analyze the context, question your judgement and think carefully about what you are going to say, that will help you in life.
#5
Added:
--> @DebateArt.com
So you and possibly others had the time to make a entire website with a debate system, forums, and a leaderboard all with an insufficient budget, but couldn't manage something so simple that would save your new members from a major inconvenience.. how about i post this issue on the platform development forum in a slightly different context about hundred times, that way i will be able to actually vote according to your sites requiem correct?
I dont see how a simple redirect for new non-qualified accounts would exactly fall under "fancy features" which require an entire payed development team to implement, but thats just my opinion. If you have a problem with me calling you lazy, i cant help you, i call things as i see them, and the only issue you seem to have here is that your not happy that i posted this specifically here as if that somehow undermines the problem in the first place.
Instigator
#4
Added:
--> @DebateArt.com
👍👍👍
#3
Added:
Also on debate.org people "enjoyed" lots of advertisements that, apparently, generated enough profits for the company to hire developers that could speed up the development process and implement some fancy features. All the income we have here is 16$ which is less than I spend on the hosting, so the development is not exactly fast, as I hope you can imagine. And also it's first time I hear about this issue, so nobody brought it up on the forum, and you didn't do that either, even though the "Platform development" is the easiest topic to find on the forum, so don't tell me about lazyness.
#2
Added:
I would recommend posting this complaint on the form...
#1
#14
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Pro ff two of the rounds and made no arguments whatsoever, that's poor conduct!
All other points tied, the debate led nowhere overall.
#13
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Pro forfeited two rounds, so he loses conduct. Also, he would have the burden of proof in this debate, and he failed to present any arguments. This is an easy win for Con.
#12
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Pro forfeited two of the rounds, and made no arguments whatsoever. Those two factors did not convince me that pro had a convincing argument.
#11
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
I would have liked to see even one decent argument from either side. I had little to vote on besides two forfeitures from Pro.
#10
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Pro forfeited two rounds and did not meet BOP.
#9
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Two forfeited from PRO.
#8
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Literally no arguments from PRO
Multiple forfeits.
CON accurately pointed our PRO did not meet their BOP.
#7
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
pro ff 2 rounds and didn't fulfill bop
#6
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
no arguments made or refuted. So lazy its like watching sponges fight.
#5
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
PRO did not ever make an argument... CON died. Bad conduct in FF
#4
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Argument: Pro didn't even try to present an argument
Conduct: Pro forfeited 2 rounds
#3
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Con correctly points out that PRO has full BoP. Even after pointing this out, PRO refuses to present a single argument in favor of the resolution. As such, both arguments and conduct go to CON.
#2
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
No contest, as pro refused to engage in the debate even when it was pointed out the minimal BoP was on him to make even a single point.
Conduct for forfeitures.
#1
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
conduct- Pro forfeits 2 rounds. Con wins.
Arguments- Both sides lacked any arguments, it's gonna have to be a tie.