Children should be preventing from competing in combat sports
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 10 votes and with 56 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 3
- Time for argument
- Two days
- Max argument characters
- 3,500
- Voting period
- One week
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
Combat Sports - A fighting style in which physical contact done to your opponent is the main objective (MMA, Boxing, Judo, etc.)
Children - People under the age of 18
Competing - Participating in tournaments or competitions
Should children be allowed to take part in these potentially dangerous sports, or do the benefits outweigh the risks?
RFD in Comments
I love free votes bc of FF
..-. ..- .-.. .-.. / ..-. ..- .-.. .-.. / ..-. --- .-. ..-. . .. - / ..-. ..- .-.. .-.. ..-. .. - -.-.-- -.-.-- -.-.--
Ff. .
01010100 01101000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01100100 01100101 01100010 01100001 01110100 01100101 00100000 01110011 01110101 01100011 01101011 01100101 01100100 00101110 00100000
FF .
FF⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
Full Forfeit. - Vote Ragnar!
Full Forfeit.
FF ten chars
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments ✔ ✗ ✗ 3 points
Better sources ✔ ✗ ✗ 2 points
Better spelling and grammar ✔ ✗ ✗ 1 point
Better conduct ✔ ✗ ✗ 1 point
Reason:the squid done did
True, although I'm really busy this week, so I might hold off debating for a while...
Easy argument for you to win this...
R2: "Children should be preventing from competing in combat sports, because they're fragile."
R3: "Extend."
And again, nothing prevents you from opening a new debate on this topic to seek a real opponent.
did you forget foot ball? arent milenials pussified enough?