Instigator
Points: 12

Assassin's creed 3 is the best AC game

Finished

The voting period has ended

After 6 votes the winner is ...
Imabench
Debate details
Publication date
Last update
Category
Games
Time for argument
Three days
Voting system
Open voting
Voting period
One week
Point system
Four points
Rating mode
Rated
Characters per argument
30,000
Contender
Points: 42
Description
No information
Round 1
Forfeited
Published:
Since I dont expect Pro to post any arguments for this debate nor respond to any of his mind because of his warped opinion on the value of critical consensus, I'll keep things nice and brief. 

1) Assassins 3 Reviews

(PS3) 85/100
(WIIU) 85/100
(X360) 84/100
(PC) 80/100

Average Metacritic Score = 83.5 / 100




List of Assassins Creed games with higher cumulative scores from critics: 

2A) Assassins Creed 2

(PS3) 91/100
(X360) 90/100
(PC) 86/100

Average Metacritic Score = 89 / 100





2B) Assassins Creed Brotherhood

(PS3) 90/100
(X360) 89/100
(PC) 88/100

Average Metacritic Score = 89 / 100




2C) Assassins Creed Black Flag

(PS3) 88/100
(WIIU) 86/100
(X360) 86/100
(PS4) 83/100
(PC) 84/100

Average Metacritic Score = 85.5 / 100




2D) Assassins Creed Odyssey

(PC) 90/100
(PS4) 83/100
(XONE) 87/100

Average Metacritic Score = 87 / 100





Overall, there are not 1, not 2, but 4 different Assassins Creed games that overall were more positively viewed by professional critics than Assassins Creed 3: Odyssey, Black Flag, Brotherhood, and AC 2..... Since Pro opted not to make arguments of his own in the first round (he is unable to do anything other than assert his own opinion anyways), I will leave things here for now. 
Round 2
Forfeited
Published:
Extend all arguments 
Round 3
Forfeited
Published:
Welp, GG
Added:
⁣📔📚           📚
📓📚📖  😫  📚📚📓
📕📚📚  📝  📗💻📘
📖⁣📖📖📖📖📖📖📖📖
Doing my homework!
✏️📝✏️📝✏️📝✏️📝
#14
Added:
Wowoweewaah very nice 👌🏼
#13
Added:
--> @Kommandant_Nomad
*******************************************************************
>Reported Vote: Kommandant_Nomad // Mod action: Not Removed
>Points Awarded: 6 points to Con for arguments, sources, and conduct
>Reason for Decision: Pretty straightfoward, Argument's to CON because PRO did not make any. Sources to CON as PRO did not list any. Grammar is tied as pro FF'ed everything. Conduct to CON for PRO's FF.
>Reason for Mod Action: This debate is a full forfeit. FF debates are no moderated unless the voter voted for the conceding side. This did not occur, so this vote is not actionable.
************************************************************************
#12
Added:
--> @Earth
*******************************************************************
>Reported Vote: Earth // Mod action: Not Removed
>Points Awarded: 7 points to Con
>Reason for Decision: Forfeit nac
>Reason for Mod Action: This debate is a full forfeit. FF debates are no moderated unless the voter voted for the conceding side. This did not occur, so this vote is not actionable.
************************************************************************
#11
Added:
--> @RationalMadman
*******************************************************************
>Reported Vote: RationalMadman // Mod action: Not Removed
>Points Awarded: 5 points to Con for arguments and sources
>Reason for Decision: What Earth said.
>Reason for Mod Action: This debate is a full forfeit. FF debates are no moderated unless the voter voted for the conceding side. This did not occur, so this vote is not actionable.
************************************************************************
#10
Added:
I forgot that you don't have the attention span to read anything resembling reason, nor the ability to understand what is actually said rather than what you wish was said..... I'll go ahead and leave you to the state of retardation you seem to like living in, feel free to post your argument whenever you're ready so that you can pick up the inevitable loss.
Contender
#9
Added:
What made you think I was going to read that? From only reading the first sentence I could tell were it was going. Regardless of what anyone thinks, this is proof that you are actually the one conceding right now. You just indirectly admitted that you don't have any arguments and only appeals to popularity and authority.
Instigator
#8
Added:
"You have to explain why it's better"
Thats the beauty of it: I dont actually have to.... There isnt any sort of objective metric to definitively show what game is better than another game, the same way there isnt an objective metric to show what movie or song is better than another movie or song..... The only options for weighing these kinds of things are personal opinion, which is completely and utterly worthless in debate that you still havent figured out yet, and collective opinions of professional critics + overall sales, which put together establish at least some sort of precedent of what game is considered more successful or better despite the inherent flaws of those kinds of metrics.
You are committed to the stupider of the two options, which is fine by me because it makes my job of taking this easy win much easier
Contender
#7
Added:
Where are your facts? Selling well does not make something better. You have to explain why it's better and not just fall back on some arbitrary standard of how many people decided to buy it based on their subjective preference.
Instigator
#6
Added:
Wouldn't be the first time you couldnt recognize basic facts as reality.
Contender
#5
Added:
I suspect the opposite of what you say is true. I don't appeal to the majority's sensibilities because I am not one of the common rabble, thus I always "lose" when it's left up to majority opinion.
Instigator
#4
Added:
If being wrong was required for winning then your debate record would be a lot better than what it is now... You're just terrible at making arguments
Contender
#3
Added:
I already told you I won't debate someone who appeals to popularity and uses sales as their sole argument. As far as winning is concerned, I'm beginning to think that being wrong is a requirement for "winning" 9/10 times. If I were to intentionally promote the exact opposite of the truth then I would "win" by majority vote much more often.
Instigator
#2
Added:
looking forward to another easy win
Contender
#1
#6
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Total forefei!
#5
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
FF(Full forefeit)
#4
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Pretty straightfoward, Argument's to CON because PRO did not make any. Sources to CON as PRO did not list any. Grammar is tied as pro FF'ed everything. Conduct to CON for PRO's FF.
#3
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Forfeited rounds
#2
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
What Earth said.
#1
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Forfeit nac