Instigator / Pro
21
1543
rating
8
debates
75.0%
won
Topic

Incels aren’t bad people. The mainstream media has portrayed them as bad people.

Status
Finished

All stages have been completed. The voting points distribution and the result are presented below.

Arguments points
9
0
Sources points
6
0
Spelling and grammar points
3
0
Conduct points
3
0

With 3 votes and 21 points ahead, the winner is ...

Exile
Parameters
More details
Publication date
Last update date
Category
Society
Time for argument
Three days
Voting system
Open voting
Voting period
One week
Point system
Four points
Rating mode
Rated
Characters per argument
10,000
Required rating
1500
Contender / Con
0
1476
rating
4
debates
25.0%
won
Description
~ 640 / 5,000

Rules of engagement are simple and as follows:

- Round one will consist of opening arguments. Rounds 2 and 3 are for rebuttal and development. Final round is for closing statements, and no new points should be introduced.

-This debate intends to challenge the definition of incel, so no specific definition will be put in place as reference. Both Pro and Con will loosely use the Wikipedia page of incels to gauge their own definitions, as long as it is not grossly inaccurate (which will be determined through voting phase). https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incel

- Failure to comply with these rules results in loss of a conduct point.

Added:
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better spelling and grammar
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Pro did everything thus he deserves everything. Con did nothing thus he deserves nothing.

Added:
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better spelling and grammar
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Full Forfeit.

Added:
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better spelling and grammar
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Generally awful people, but full forfeit.