Instigator / Con
6
1475
rating
2
debates
0.0%
won
Topic

Women aren't in leadership roles because they are scared.

Status
Finished

All stages have been completed. The voting points distribution and the result are presented below.

Arguments points
3
12
Sources points
2
8
Spelling and grammar points
1
4
Conduct points
0
4

With 4 votes and 22 points ahead, the winner is ...

Trent0405
Parameters
More details
Publication date
Last update date
Category
Society
Time for argument
One week
Voting system
Open voting
Voting period
Two weeks
Point system
Four points
Rating mode
Rated
Characters per argument
10,000
Contender / Pro
28
1707
rating
32
debates
84.38%
won
Description
~ 231 / 5,000

This debate focuses on the reasons as to why women are not found in leadership roles as frequently as men. I hope that we focus on numerous different reasons and that we regard the history of women as well as modern life for women.

Added:
Criterion
Con
Tie
Pro
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better spelling and grammar
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

full forfeit

Added:
Criterion
Con
Tie
Pro
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better spelling and grammar
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Neither side brought any arguments, so it is a tie.

Neither pro nor con made any grammatical mistakes or spelling errors to be observed, so it is also a tie.

Pro's evidence didn't support why women aren't in leadership roles because they are scared(even in parts).

Con forfeited, conduct point goes to pro.

Added:
Criterion
Con
Tie
Pro
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better spelling and grammar
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Full Forfeit.

Added:
Criterion
Con
Tie
Pro
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better spelling and grammar
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Full forfeiture.

Next time when someone forfeits and an argument is already prepared, there is no reason not to share it.