Instigator / Pro
Points: 22

Think of a good title for the typical Donald Trump road show

Finished

The voting period has ended

After 6 votes the winner is ...
oromagi
Debate details
Publication date
Last update
Category
Politics
Time for argument
Two days
Voting system
Open voting
Voting period
Two weeks
Point system
Four points
Rating mode
Rated
Characters per argument
10,000
Contender / Con
Points: 42
Description
A good title would be...
THE WALKING DEAD
starring your favorite president.
Round 1
Forfeited
Published:
Round 2
Published:
A Barf A Minute
Published:
M ake
A merica
G reat (Depression)
A gain
Added:
--> @Virtuoso, @Trent0405, @Ragnar
6 votes. yippee
Contender
#10
Added:
--> @Dr.Franklin, @User_2006, @fauxlaw
Wow, six votes. I never get six votes. Thx, people
Contender
#9
Added:
oromagi..
Whatever makes you happy!
Instigator
#8
Added:
--> @ramdatt
Thx, ramdatt
Since I hope to profit by your profligacy, I won’t find fault. Don’t be surprised or offended if the mods work to slow your roll, since we are trying to build a standard of reasoned engagement above mere assertion or self-expression here.
Contender
#7
Added:
--> @ramdatt
Well do me a favour please.
Go to that debate about Trumps father and at least put a punctuation mark down so i can post my argument.
If you do not agree with my argument, then you can refute it in round 2.
#6
Added:
--> @oromagi
Yes, i've made a few haven't i.
That will stop when isolation stops however.
I am having an indoor holiday.
Also really enjoyed that debate we had.
#5
Added:
I have zero interest in winning a debate. My only interest is in showing how much I appreciate the president.
Instigator
#4
Added:
--> @Nevets
A back-handed compliment may be inferred from the fact that although you are also a prolific debate maker, we aren't snatching so many of yours- understanding that your debates are no easy win.
Contender
#3
Added:
--> @Nevets
I'm convinced that ramdatt has no plan to engage. We have seen debaters before who crank out a lot of titles for visibility but give little or no engagement (see type1/sparrow's and billbatard's debates for examples). You'll notice that RatMan and I are snatching up a bunch of these in the anticipation of cheap victories.
Contender
#2
Added:
More debates? I thought you would have your hands full already
#1
#6
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Argument: 2-1 in Con's favor by forefit
Sources: neither side 0-0
S&G: Con had greater risk of failure Con 2-1
Conduct: Con 2-1 by forefit
#5
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
" a barf a minute"
Oh god, that is terrible
#4
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Oromagi at least made sense of it. "a barf a minute" just doesn't make sense. Arguments and S&G go to Con. Conduct go to con because at least he didn't forfeit even if he put less effort than usual.
#3
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
No arguments presented from either side. But Pro did forfeit.
#2
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Interesting contest debate, but I think con landed the better insults against Trump due to puns.
Conduct for forfeiture.
#1
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
I score these types of debates by scoring each round. Whoever gets the most points wins.
Round 1
Pro forfeited, con wins automatically. Score 0-1
Round 2
A Barf A Minute is cute, but I liked con's MAGA parody better.
Score 0-2. Con wins.