I have a question for debaters obsessed with VICTORY
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 4 votes and with 21 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 2
- Time for argument
- Two days
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- Two weeks
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
When you win a debate, how much do you save on your next New York City subway ride ?
Argument: 2-1 to Con by content and forfeit
Sources: 2 - 0 to Con
S&G: 2-0 to Con by content
Conduct: 2-0 to Con by forfeit
I guess Con answered the question so he wins args. Pro also forfeited.
Question debates are always weird. Con provided an answer, it went unchallenged, so he wins.
Conduct for forfeiture.
Pro forfeited, failed to produce any convincing arguments with any sources, and wrote only a single sentence without errors. Con did not forfeit, used sources to make a convincing argument, and all of them are readable with little to no errors. Thus most points to Con. Con would have won anyways consider Con is a master at debating and Pro has put little to no effort into debating.
thank u folks 4 voting
I have a question for people that start debates but don't want to debate...
Why bother starting a debate?
Id like to ride on a train someday. A not so crowded one.
"I have a question for debaters obsessed with VICTORY"
Bruh this site IS for victory. If you are caring for the US then go read news or something. Leave this site. This site is not for politic-packed clowns.
No need to thank me. Even a treestalk could have won a debate with ramdatt.