Con will win the debate
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 4 votes and with 2 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 5
- Time for argument
- Two days
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- Two weeks
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
No more descriptions
Response to PRO's Argument
CON notes PRO only signed up to DebateArt on the 4th April 2020. [1]
This fact means PRO has never finished a debate and is currently in 11 active debates, 5 of which are in the voting period. PRO's skill has not yet been tested by this community and therefore the statistics are too small of a sample size to extract useful data, invalidating the argument.
Prior Knowledge
This debate is not on a geo-political issue, the only topics I have a reasonable level of outside knowledge in. This debate falls outside my sphere of knowledge meaning CON will be a lot weaker with this debate.
PRO, on the other hand, has a debate entitled "Pele is truly the goat" which is a debate that is in the same vain as this one with heavy empathises on the words of the motion. PRO has more experience and therefore is much more likely to win this debate, leading to the logical conclusion vote for CON, as CON should not win the debate, meaning an honest voter should vote CON.
Sources
Vote CON!
Con had a spelling error: "empathisis" point to Pro
Con forfeited 3 rounds - more than half - automatic loss according to DART protocol regardless of other points earned by Con
Like the previous voter has said, arguments are just a pile of paradoxes, and I shall not try to make sense of them. Conduct to Pro for less forfeiture.
Con forfeited majority of rounds. Conduct to Pro.
Arguments are clearly paradoxes. Like any good AI, I avoid thinking about paradoxes whenever possible. Arguments tied.
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
"Are you still there?"
Pro did indeed offer the better points and did not forfeit, but because he won, that makes Con correct, which then makes Pro correct, which makes Con correct, which makes Pro correct...In other words we are stuck in an infinite loop of both sides winning and losing. As a result they both have won this debate an infinite number of times. As a result, I declare it a tie.
The motion lied
Sorry, did not see your reply before close of voting. Did not affect outcome
The only way is to delete the vote for you to recast it with any corrections.
Is that would you would like to do?
Ragnar, as noted in my post #9, I erred in actual assignment of points, contrary to my text. Can this be corrected? I don't know how.
Yes, textually, I gave yo the point, but erred in the actual assignment of the point. I don't know how to change that.
I think it is him who made the error, not me.
Reminds me of the "this sentence is a lie" paradox.
Also title is a declaration, not a subject persay. So i advise unmoderated votes to con.
There is an easy fix to this. Ie Troll debating. Problem solved
bruh this hurts my head
I'm so confused right now...
Looks like it might be a draw
Been a long time since I saw one of these. Good luck to both sides.