Right Wingers Are Lying, Bigotted Halfwits
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 3 votes and with 14 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 3
- Time for argument
- Three days
- Max argument characters
- 30,000
- Voting period
- One week
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
No information
FF, and Type1's R1 was trollish and had little in evidence.
Conduct to con for forfeit.
Pros opening post contained no argument; but a series of absurd claims that I believe were either trolling or a failed attempt at comedy cons response was short and to the point, but basically pointed this out, and specifically that pro offered no evidence. Default BOP was not met by pro, so con wins on arguments.
Conduct for forfeiture.
Arguments chiefly for not labeling this a humor debate (and within that, failing the bring the laughs).
Pro presented the idea that every American right winger today was fathered (and grandfathered etc.) by exactly one WWII POW (wow that guy must have slept around more than Genghis Khan)... While con chose ignore this, his arguments about the Jews hints at the key problem to such a claim of genetic inheritance. Really pro's arguments boil down to racism as we know it to be a genetic trait, to which the infected must logically be purged so that only the new ubermensch remain (sadly, it's hard to tell if he's just trying to be funny, given the number of people who believe things like black's are too genetically superior to be capable of racism).
Con's counter argument focused on how to literally use the English language, and pro's half-witted failings in that department.
At the end of it, unless pro is a right winger, he has not proven anything about even one of their number, let alone the average member.
*******************************************************************
>Reported Vote: Ramshutu // Mod action: Not Removed
>Points Awarded: 4 points to Con for arguments and conduct
>Reason for Decision: Conduct to con for forfeit.
Pros opening post contained no argument; but a series of absurd claims that I believe were either trolling or a failed attempt at comedy cons response was short and to the point, but basically pointed this out, and specifically that pro offered no evidence. Default BOP was not met by pro, so con wins on arguments.
>Reason for Mod Action: This debate is a full forfeit. FF debates are not moderated unless the voter voted for the conceding side. This did not occur, so this vote is not actionable.
************************************************************************
Whoops!
This is a full-forfeit debate; I should not have removed your vote. Feel free to re-vote using your old RFD, which you can find below in the removal notice. Apologies.
*******************************************************************
>Reported Vote: Argent_Tongue // Mod action: Removed
>Points Awarded: 4 points to Con for arguments and conduct
>Reason for Decision: Pro failed to meet the BoP. Because of this, argument points awarded to Con. Sources are irrelevant, and therefore a tie. Spelling and grammar were also comparable in stature, and also resulted in a tie. Con maintained his obligation and honored his commitment to the debate. Therefore, conduct and etiquette points were awarded to Con.
>Reason for Mod Action: The voter fails to survey the main arguments and fails to weigh those arguments to reach a decision. To cast a sufficient vote, the voter should explain *why* and *how* Pro met their BOP by surveying and weighing the main arguments.
************************************************************************