Points: 49

[NO KRITIK ON GOD'S EXISTENCE] The real God is more likely feminine vs masculine. (Pro vs Con)

Finished

The voting period has ended

After 7 votes the winner is ...
RationalMadman
Debate details
Publication date
Last update
Category
Philosophy
Time for argument
Three days
Voting system
Open voting
Voting period
Two months
Point system
Four points
Rating mode
Rated
Characters per argument
30,000
Contender
Points: 14
Description
You cannot Kritik God's existence, you must argue against this notion.
Round 1
Published:
I'll wait and see what my opponent brings in light of God's masculinity and am not going to give my opponent too much to attack in R2 when this is a 5-round freestyle debate.

Let's just lay out the basics:

  1. Females create life and things the are conscious but not them, males... Interact with, protect, control and/or use said being but don't create them. God is so severely feminine that her ONLY function is the creation, her interaction is very minimalist and much more 'let's see how my beautiful children evolve' overall.
  2. A feminine God would probably lie about herself a lot, allowing only the most courageous and wise of men (or women, she's probably bisexual since she made both) to solve the mystery and seduce her. A masculine God, if it really is as depicted in the Abrahamic religions or any religion so far with a male 'he' God, is going to aggressively ensure we know just who we're dealing with and would rule us with a blatant iron fist. The elegance of the mystery shrouding God's true identity and nature itself is effeminate much more so than it is masculine.
  3. Men have nipples and in almost all gendered species, males function as if they came AFTER (came after ;) ;) ) the women. The penis is fitted to the vagina, the vagina is 0% fitted to the penis. The vagina is fitted to take in 'something' but mostly is designed around how to get the creature produce in the uterus OUT but not being so loose it falls out beforehand even if the pregnant women is totally relaxed. This is indicative of the male being designed around the female. The tale if Adam and Eve must indeed be interpreted totally wrong or be a lie if we are to seriously think Adam was created first and Eve FOR HIM.
  4. The male demigods of Hinduism have a creator... The creator interacts with a supreme force known as Brahman but let's think for a minute... The Creator Brahma (not Brahman) is 'interacting' and 'producing' via direct interactions with the raw essence of reality, Brahman itself. It's almost like the male Brahma is REPRODUCING what Brahman has already envisioned and thus 'produced' mentally speaking.
That's all for now.

Forfeited
Round 2
Forfeited
Forfeited
Round 3
Published:
God likes me more than you, she digs my masculinity.
Forfeited
Round 4
Published:
End of discussion.
Forfeited
Round 5
Forfeited
Added:
@ Rational
I know you blocked me, but if you see this, I am down to debate you and won't FF.
#1
#7
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Full forfeit
#6
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
full forfeit
#5
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Full forefeit
#4
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Forfeit happens.
#3
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
This could have been an interesting debate if it wasn’t a full forfeit
#2
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Con sadly forfeited the debate. Conduct to Pro for that.
I hope I wasn't the only person who felt it was a bad idea to let an avowed Atheist defend God in a debate?
#1
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
I disagree with Pro, but I think he deserves to win because he made more convincing arguments. Con forfeit the whole debate, which is poor arguments as well as poor conduct.