Instigator / Con
4
1470
rating
50
debates
40.0%
won
Topic
#2012

The most important use for intercourse is procreation and reproduction.

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
0
3
Better sources
2
2
Better legibility
1
1
Better conduct
1
1

After 1 vote and with 3 points ahead, the winner is...

Crocodile
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
2
Time for argument
Two days
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
One week
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Pro
7
1436
rating
22
debates
38.64%
won
Description

My view in this debate does not accurately represent my view in real life.

Criterion
Con
Tie
Pro
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

I believe Pro met their burden of proof, but they could have done better. Here is my assessment of the major points of contention:

Should the debate be restricted to humans?
-Firstly, I'd like to point out that Con should have defined this when they set up the debate. As a voter, I would rather read substantive arguments over the issue at hand rather than read a battle over definitions. Do the legwork when setting up a debate to avoid unnecessary definition battles. That being said, Pro demonstrated that sex is usually referred to as between humans, but not always. Thus, Pro is justified in extending the scope of this debate to all organisms that sexually reproduce.

Pro's opening arguments.
-Both of Pro's opening arguments were solid and remained solid by the time the debate had concluded. That reproduction enables survival is a no-brainer, and Pro takes advantage of this. As stated previously, Pro defends his extension of the debate to include all organisms, so his second argument is solid as well.

Con's prevalence=importance argument.
-As I understood it, Con argued that because so many people have sex for pleasure, pleasure is the most important role for sex. Pro countered by saying that happiness does not equal importance, which is ok, but I think Pro missed the true weakness in Con's argument. Why should prevalence equal importance? This implicit assumption is not defended by Con and is not attacked by Pro.

Conclusion: Though Pro could have done a better job countering Con's only positive argument, Pro still succeeded to a great enough degree in all the areas of contention for him to secure points for arguments.

Additional note: Con, if you set up a 2-round debate, and you put yourself in the underdog position (as you clearly did here), the last thing you should do is voluntarily waive a round. The fact that your opponent got the last word only made your decision to waive all the more devastating for your cause.