Instigator / Pro
1
1417
rating
158
debates
32.59%
won
Topic
#2017

This Debate is Stupid

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Winner
1
3

After 4 votes and with 2 points ahead, the winner is...

User_2006
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
1
Time for argument
One day
Max argument characters
100
Voting period
One week
Point system
Winner selection
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
3
1470
rating
50
debates
40.0%
won
Description

"stupid" definition: having or showing a great lack of intelligence or common sense.

This debate: this exact argument we are having

Burden of proof is shared

-->
@truthbomb

Did you come from DDO? Because this is how DDO verifies.

Cool, I thought it might involve a verified phone number or something.

-->
@truthbomb

Pretty much you need to complete two debates or play a game of Mafia, then you can vote.

How do I vote?

oh, not bad...

Okie, it is intentional.

100 characters?? That is not enough to unleash my true potential. I usually write 2000 characters in a normal debate on a good day.

Defining your terms is a very smart move in any debate...wait a minute...

Alrighty. Have fun!

This time, I am not being the semantic man I had been. Being pragmatic is rather useful in this debate.

Semantically. Every debate is stupid.
Stupid
Having or showing a great lack of intelligence or common sense.
Only if we become omniscient is any debate not stupid. But then again, it would be stupid to have a debate if you are omniscient. Unless you just want a non omniscient being to realize they are stupid.

This would be better debate, i think.

I know this may seem like an easy win for me, but strong disagreement exists.

-->
@seldiora

I suggest making it two rounds, as single rounds deny you any chance to make dumb replies, in turn automatically dropping every point con raises. Which yes is stupid, but perhaps too stupid to give you the win you seek.