BLARGGH - Should this be allowed?
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 6 votes and with 14 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 5
- Time for argument
- Three days
- Max argument characters
- 420
- Voting period
- Six months
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
BLARGGH is a very dangerous substance for public health. Dr Anthony Fauci has said BLARGGH is the number one leading cause of death in the US. BLARGGH is involved in norad and haarp machines. BLARGGH is almost as bad as black beans which supply 85% of the protein in BLARGGH. The question: should blarggh be allowed?
What is BLARGGH? - it’s up to you
BoP - shared because BLARGGH
This is an actual debate. I’m supplying a few prompts for the contender to build off of. I thought it would be fun having an argument about something we know nothing about. I might do this in the future with a rated debate.
I feel like pro kept con on his feet more than con could refute
Arguments:
Pro got the last word. Therefore, the argument point goes to Pro.
Sources:
Con successfully countered Pro's use of totallynotavirus.xyz, arguing that it is Chinese Government Propaganda. Pro fails to counter this point, thus rendering this source void. However, Con did not counter the other sources that Pro used (definitelycentrist.com and communism.orgyz). For this, the sources point goes to Pro.
S&G:
It is common knowledge that BLARGGH is an acronym, and thus it should be capitalized. Pro wrote it once as "Blarggh", while Con wrote it as "blarggh". While Pro's spelling blunder is bad, Con's is worse. Thus, S&G goes to Pro.
Conduct:
"Support Taiwan, like you said in your other debate!"
Here, Con referenced something in another one of Pro's debates. This is cross-debate contamination, which is an egregious conduct violation. Conduct point to Pro.
Argument: Pro managed to keep Con on the defensive after round 1. As a result, Con spent more of the debate in rebuttal than in positive argument.
Sources: No sources from either side, except one* which will be discussed under Conduct.
S&G tie
Conduct: Con referred to a previous debate by Pro; not good conduct and a worse source.
Arguments are just confusing jokes. No sources. S&G good on both sides. No forfeitures, thus equal conduct.
Arguments: None of the arguments made sense.
Sources: No sources
S&G: Both sides presentable
Conduct: Tie
This is most likely not moderated because it is naught excluding nonsense.
This debate was quite entertaining, but it is clear the debate was merely satire, as a result I am uncomfortable assigning the arguments point. Both sides had good conduct so that will also be a tie.
This reminds me of a conversation I once had with my mom. We were discussing gnelefants (you pronounce the "g"). Gnelefants, are, of course, not a real thing, but we had a good long discussion on their dangers, uses, misuses, health benefits, health concerns, and the importance of knowing your types of gnelefants.
it wasn't even me who debated thisz
wow i won this finally
***
This is a comedy debate, so generally not moderated.
-Ragnar, DM
***
I don't know if you are playing dumb or you are mocking me, but what you are saying is essentially 2x2= -4.
“Grown adults”
This is a double positive, which means that both myself and Crocodile are children.
I need to offer the obvious K to the topic: BLARRGH should not be allowed, it should be simultaneously mandatory and banned.
"You don’t know nothing."
Because that is a double negative, it means I know something, which is truism consider if I know nothing, I won't even be writing this comment because I don't know how to operate a computer nor use English if so.
Could you vote on this debate: https://www.debateart.com/debates/2012/the-most-important-use-for-intercourse-is-procreation-and-reproduction
THANKS
You don’t know nothing.
BLARRGH is the key to the universe.
Please add BLARRGHISM to the list of religons.
But studies about BLARGGH are still coming out. We voters need more than six months to analizie it properly!
OK. we just witnessed two grown adults making something that could have minor negative effects on our health, to something essential for humanity, to something detrimental to humanity, bla bla bla.
What is Blarggh? I am confused. Is this some type of technology that China needs?
;–(
Y u gotta do me like dis bruh??
Ha I got it first
420? That is barely enough for a single paragraph!
Ok.
Make the number of characters 420 and I'll do it