BLARGGH - Should this be allowed?

1436

rating

debates

38.64%

won

Description

BLARGGH is a very dangerous substance for public health. Dr Anthony Fauci has said BLARGGH is the number one leading cause of death in the US. BLARGGH is involved in norad and haarp machines. BLARGGH is almost as bad as black beans which supply 85% of the protein in BLARGGH. The question: should blarggh be allowed?

What is BLARGGH? - it’s up to you
BoP - shared because BLARGGH

This is an actual debate. I’m supplying a few prompts for the contender to build off of. I thought it would be fun having an argument about something we know nothing about. I might do this in the future with a rated debate.

Round 1

05.21.2020 01:43PM

Con

Blarrgh is very dangerous for public health. Blarrgh can cause stomach irritation and heart disease but that’s not the worst part. It can also cause a fatal addiction to mayonaise. Blarggh infiltrates it’s victim’s skin through their Microsoft support mechanism. This is why blarggh should not be allowed. Just think about one of your family members dying from mayonaise. All because of blarggh, which we could prevent.

05.21.2020 02:16PM

Pro

Blarrgh has shown amazing effects when curing diseases such as LARGH and ZARGH. I believe that some of it's nastier side effects is worth it as LARGH has a 100% death rate without Blarrgh. My opponent may bring up uterrly false facts such as addiction to mayonaise, but BLARRGH also supplies Apple, Google, and even the US Government with several technologies. Yes, families may die, but many more millions more suffer from LARGH. Thank you.

Round 2

05.21.2020 02:22PM

Con

Ah hah, and that is your own demise. Because so many people have been exposed to BLARGGH, they have not realized it contains a nasty chemical that in fact causes LARGH and ZARGH, which then forces people to take more BLARGGH, which makes a looping supply chain. In fact, bill gates says that there is only one disease, which is in fact called BLEP. BLEP is treatable with BLIP, so why legalize BLARGGH?

05.21.2020 04:43PM

Pro

See you have shot your one foot, I'm afraid my friend. BLEP is treatable with BLIP. Yes, yes, I agree. But, what is BLIP made of?

Correct, none other than BLARGGH.

As to your other points about the chemicals that contain both LARGH and ZARGH. Well, that is curable with BLIP, which needs BLARGGH in the first place. I have proved that BLARGGH is crucial in the supply chain of the earth as well as beyond. This is because, rockets made by SpaceX use BLARGGH, and as I stated, so does Apple and Google.

Thank you.

Round 3

05.21.2020 04:47PM

Con

Please tell me why the Taiwanese company that makes BLIP would collaborate with the Chinese company that makes BLARGGH. It makes absolutely no sense. China is trying to get you to believe this. Support Taiwan, like you said in your other debate! If we legalize BLARGGH, China will make 5G towers out of it and then there will actually be side effects of 5G. China wants to make this all muddled in a web of conspiracy.

05.21.2020 04:52PM

Pro

The Chinese Government wants you to believe that in the first place. Both companies are located in Taiwan. The one that makes BLARRGH and BLIP. BLARRGH is amazing, and the Chinese government wants it.. The Chinese government said that the BLARRGH company is located in China to get more leverage on the world overall, and the company that makes BLARRGH is too scared to act. As to the 5G points, BLARRGH has shown no signs of being able to build 5G towers; China is trying to reverse engineer it. Thank you

Round 4

05.23.2020 12:54AM

Con

BLARGGH laid in the sun for two weeks becomes harder than steel.

That is science.

I want you to refute that.

05.23.2020 09:08PM

Pro

See my friend, I can easily refute that.

BLARRGH is the sun. According to totallynotavirus.xyz BLARRGH makes up the sun. BLARRGH IS the Sun. All stars have BLARRGH. We are here because of BLARRGH. The little singularity that started the universe was BLARRGH. God is BLARRGH. That, is science. That is the truth. This small blue planet was brought to you by BLARRGH. Thank you.

Round 5

05.24.2020 03:45AM

Con

totallynotavirus.xyz is a far-right website funded by the Chinese government to make you think BLARGGH is good. I’m telling you, if BLARGGH is legalized, China will BAN Bart Simpson, which is a violation of free speech. BLARGGH enters the body through the nose and infiltrates the brain stem where it modifies the information coming from nerves in the limbs. If 5G towers are made of that stuff, we’ll be mind controlled.

05.24.2020 12:35PM

Pro

#10

But not just totallynotavirus.xyz says this. Many other news sources including defitnleycentrist.com and communism.orgyz say the same thing.

Who cares about 5G towers, when we are here because of BLARRGH. Your phone is made of BLARRGH. Everything is BLARRGH. We are BLARRGH. BLARRGH is essential. Bart Simpson is the creator of BLARRGH.

Math_Enthusiast

03.14.2023 06:53PM

#19

This reminds me of a conversation I once had with my mom. We were discussing gnelefants (you pronounce the "g"). Gnelefants, are, of course, not a real thing, but we had a good long discussion on their dangers, uses, misuses, health benefits, health concerns, and the importance of knowing your types of gnelefants.

11.20.2020 12:43PM

#18

it wasn't even me who debated thisz

11.20.2020 12:42PM

#17

wow i won this finally

Barney

06.10.2020 12:44AM

#16

***
This is a comedy debate, so generally not moderated.

-Ragnar, DM
***

05.25.2020 02:15AM

#15

-->

@nmvarco

I don't know if you are playing dumb or you are mocking me, but what you are saying is essentially 2x2= -4.

05.25.2020 01:57AM

#14

-->

@User_2006

“Grown adults”

This is a double positive, which means that both myself and Crocodile are children.

Barney

05.25.2020 01:19AM

#13

I need to offer the obvious K to the topic: BLARRGH should not be allowed, it should be simultaneously mandatory and banned.

05.24.2020 07:42PM

#12

-->

@nmvarco

"You don’t know nothing."

Because that is a double negative, it means I know something, which is truism consider if I know nothing, I won't even be writing this comment because I don't know how to operate a computer nor use English if so.

05.24.2020 06:46PM

#11

-->

@nmvarco

Could you vote on this debate: https://www.debateart.com/debates/2012/the-most-important-use-for-intercourse-is-procreation-and-reproduction
THANKS

05.24.2020 06:42PM

#10

-->

@User_2006

You don’t know nothing.

05.24.2020 06:11PM

-->

@DebateArt.com

@Barney

BLARRGH is the key to the universe.

Please add BLARRGHISM to the list of religons.

Barney

05.24.2020 05:55PM

-->

@nmvarco

@Crocodile

But studies about BLARGGH are still coming out. We voters need more than six months to analizie it properly!

05.24.2020 05:44PM

OK. we just witnessed two grown adults making something that could have minor negative effects on our health, to something essential for humanity, to something detrimental to humanity, bla bla bla.

05.22.2020 12:56PM

What is Blarggh? I am confused. Is this some type of technology that China needs?

PressF4Respect

05.21.2020 03:47PM

-->

@Crocodile

;–(

Y u gotta do me like dis bruh??

05.21.2020 01:40PM

-->

@PressF4Respect

Ha I got it first

05.21.2020 01:32PM

-->

@nmvarco

420? That is barely enough for a single paragraph!

05.21.2020 12:50PM

-->

@PressF4Respect

Ok.

PressF4Respect

05.21.2020 05:10AM

-->

@nmvarco

Make the number of characters 420 and I'll do it

seldiora

08.10.2020 06:16PM

Criterion

Con

Tie

Pro

Points

Better arguments

3 point(s)

Better sources

2 point(s)

Better legibility

1 point(s)

Better conduct

1 point(s)

Reason:

I feel like pro kept con on his feet more than con could refute

PressF4Respect

06.14.2020 01:35AM

Criterion

Con

Tie

Pro

Points

Better arguments

3 point(s)

Better sources

2 point(s)

Better legibility

1 point(s)

Better conduct

1 point(s)

Reason:

Arguments:
Pro got the last word. Therefore, the argument point goes to Pro.

Sources:
Con successfully countered Pro's use of totallynotavirus.xyz, arguing that it is Chinese Government Propaganda. Pro fails to counter this point, thus rendering this source void. However, Con did not counter the other sources that Pro used (definitelycentrist.com and communism.orgyz). For this, the sources point goes to Pro.

S&G:
It is common knowledge that BLARGGH is an acronym, and thus it should be capitalized. Pro wrote it once as "Blarggh", while Con wrote it as "blarggh". While Pro's spelling blunder is bad, Con's is worse. Thus, S&G goes to Pro.

Conduct:
"Support Taiwan, like you said in your other debate!"
Here, Con referenced something in another one of Pro's debates. This is cross-debate contamination, which is an egregious conduct violation. Conduct point to Pro.

fauxlaw

06.06.2020 06:45PM

Criterion

Con

Tie

Pro

Points

Better arguments

3 point(s)

Better sources

2 point(s)

Better legibility

1 point(s)

Better conduct

1 point(s)

Reason:

Argument: Pro managed to keep Con on the defensive after round 1. As a result, Con spent more of the debate in rebuttal than in positive argument.

Sources: No sources from either side, except one* which will be discussed under Conduct.

S&G tie

Conduct: Con referred to a previous debate by Pro; not good conduct and a worse source.

VonKlempter

05.27.2020 08:35AM

Criterion

Con

Tie

Pro

Points

Better arguments

3 point(s)

Better sources

2 point(s)

Better legibility

1 point(s)

Better conduct

1 point(s)

Reason:

Arguments are just confusing jokes. No sources. S&G good on both sides. No forfeitures, thus equal conduct.