Instigator / Pro
70
1489
rating
19
debates
42.11%
won
Topic
#2088

The exposure of Christian civilization and trade was detrimental to India in most possible ways

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
30
0
Better sources
20
2
Better legibility
10
1
Better conduct
10
0

After 10 votes and with 67 points ahead, the winner is...

shadow_712
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
4
Time for argument
Three days
Max argument characters
20,000
Voting period
Two weeks
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
3
1438
rating
7
debates
14.29%
won
Description

No information

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

When an Indian tells you that Christian Colonialism had a negative impact on India, the best approach is to go 'damn fucking right' and leave the room if you disagree.

The opponent in this debate decided to take both approaches at once.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

I've hesitated to vote on this debate, having experienced a concurrent, apparent full forfeiture [still awaiting a r5 from Con], and therefore possible bias, but I think I can overcome the bias to judge fairly since the forfeiture by Con is so marked after a good r1 argument. Con's absence from the site appears to be of long duration, and I hope all is well with Con. However, by forfeiture, Con's argument, sources, s&g and conduct have been failures in this debate.

Full forfeiture - points to Pro.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

A good start in R1, but ultimately a foul frankfurter.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

A good start in R1, but ultimately a full forfeiture.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

A good start in R1, but ultimately a full forfeiture.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Full forfeit.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

A good start in R1, but ultimately a full forfeiture.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

A good start in R1, but ultimately a full forfeiture.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

A good start in R1, but ultimately a full forfeiture.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

A good start in R1, but ultimately a full forfeiture.