Instigator / Con
7
1483
rating
327
debates
40.21%
won
Topic
#2137

God and Santa

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
0
6
Better sources
4
4
Better legibility
1
2
Better conduct
2
2

After 2 votes and with 7 points ahead, the winner is...

RationalMadman
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
4
Time for argument
One week
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
One week
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Pro
14
1697
rating
556
debates
68.17%
won
Description

Disclaimer : Regardless of the setup for voting win or lose, The aim of this interaction, Is for those that view it, Learn and or take away anything that will amount to any constructive value ultimately. So that counts as anything that'll cause one to reconsider an idea, Understand a subject better, Help build a greater wealth of knowledge getting closer to truth. When either of us has accomplished that with any individual here, That's who the victor of the debate becomes.

Please demonstrate how the two concepts are the same.

Believing in Santa Claus is likened to the belief in God.

How so?

For clarity or questions, Please send a message or comment prior to accepting debate.

I'll pose this question to you and it's quite simple and direct. Has Santa been proven to be false according to the claim?

-->
@Mall

Improving your arguments and presentation thereof.

It'll help in what sir or ma'am?

-->
@Mall

This will help you a lot:
https://tiny.cc/DebateArt

I lazily assumed the topic was a typo of God and Satan

As per the description, all pro needs to do is demonstrate that believing in Santa Claus is likened to the belief in God.

-->
@fauxlaw

He came from DDO and that is why he uses the description as A1. However it is curious that he did not make any clear arguments.

-->
@User_2006

A chickenshyte tactic.

-->
@fauxlaw

He is probably waiving.

-->
@Mall

Mall's round 1 reiterates the description, but the description asks for "how" the one subject is likened to the other. I see no "how." Argument failure. Need a better argument than reiteration.