Instigator / Con
4
1483
rating
327
debates
40.21%
won
Topic
#2139

What is the proof that God exists?

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
0
3
Better sources
2
2
Better legibility
1
1
Better conduct
1
1

After 1 vote and with 3 points ahead, the winner is...

PressF4Respect
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
5
Time for argument
One week
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
One week
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Pro
7
1523
rating
10
debates
50.0%
won
Description

Disclaimer : Regardless of the setup for voting win or lose, The aim of this interaction, Is for those that view it, Learn and or take away anything that will amount to any constructive value ultimately. So that counts as anything that'll cause one to reconsider an idea, Understand a subject better, Help build a greater wealth of knowledge getting closer to truth. When either of us has accomplished that with any individual here, That's who the victor of the debate becomes.

Please attempt to provide practical, Repeatable examples that present the existence of God.
I will attempt to show invalidation and inconsistency.

For clarity or questions, Please comment or send a message prior to accepting the debate.

Criterion
Con
Tie
Pro
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Press, in my eyes, has won.

Mall did not define what "God" really is and any exploitation on the definition could pass through. Pro has stated that God exists as a concept in the bible, as a result, he exists.

Con then stated that Pro must prove that he physically exists, a requirement never stated before. It is safe to say it is fallacious and it is not enough to disprove Pro's argument. This goes on for the next few rounds and Pro has never really been disproven.