Pornography and Prostitution alike
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 1 vote and with 2 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 3
- Time for argument
- Three days
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- One week
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
Disclaimer : Regardless of the setup for voting win or lose, The aim of this interaction, Is for those that view it, Learn and or take away anything that will amount to any constructive value ultimately. So that counts as anything that'll cause one to reconsider an idea, Understand a subject better, Help build a greater wealth of knowledge getting closer to truth. When either of us has accomplished that with any individual here, That's who the victor of the debate becomes.
So the technicality here as I understand it, The loophole is in the work or activity with pornography in that under the law, It's classified as an artistic platform. So this means folks are being paid directly for participating in a movie containing actual sexual activity. The sexual activity is being indirectly paid for. That's the technicality, Makes it legal. Prostitution is just the opposite.
So dealing with adult film entertainment and the use of brothels, What do I say?
I would argue that both of these things amount to the same bottom line. Many pornographic films don't necessarily have much of a story behind them. Take a camera along with some flimsy script, Down to such and such avenue, Call that hooker over.
Between these two things, The lines are blurred, Not much of a difference.
Like marijuana having it's loophole for legality, The same with P. And P.
The law should have discernment of the end result in everything. It's understood that it does not so people fight for "reach-arounds" to get protection for things they know are not sanctioned if they can't get a way around the system. Simply undermine in every which a way.
So P. And P. Should stand on the same side of the law. At the end of it, It's about nobody getting hurt, Either way.
For clarity or questions, Please send a message or comment prior to accepting debate.
Pro did well in showing that on the surface they indeed have similarities, in that they both involve money and sex. Con on the other hand contrasted them to show they are more dissimilar in that one is the taxed production of goods and the other an unregulated service, which pro dropped. Pro instead got caught up in how con could dislike the goods one more than the service, which missed the point of ways they were more different than alike.
The pro case could have been greatly strengthened with focus on the exploitation angle.
The con case could have been greatly strengthened with focus on the legal battles or on the slippery slope of saying they are alike risks saying anything that is alike one is like the other, such as painters.
Conduct for forfeiture.
**************************************************
>Reported Vote: Intelligence_06 // Mod action: Removed
>Points Awarded: 4:0; 4 points to Pro.
>Reason for Decision: See Comments Tab.
>Reason for Mod Action:
It's an understandable mistake without "alike" defined, but the description clarified legalities, and con's arguments of non-alike traits does not seem to have been weighed properly.
To award argument points, the voter must:
(1) survey the main argument and counterargument in the debate,
(2) weigh those arguments and counterarguments against each other, and
(3) explain, based on the weighing process, how they reached their decision.
The voter acted in such a way to suggest they did not give fair weighting to the debate content.
**************************************************
---
Intelligence_06
6 hours ago
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments ✔ ✗ ✗ 3 points
Better sources ✗ ✔ ✗ 2 points
Better spelling and grammar ✗ ✔ ✗ 1 point
Better conduct ✔ ✗ ✗ 1 point
Reason:
Arguments: PRO successfully argued that P and P are alike, and CON did not argue what he is to argue: Neither of them is alike in any way, which is significantly harder. In my eyes, PRO wins the arguments. CON only pointed out the differences between the two but otherwise, they are still alike.
Conduct: Forfeit.
Sources: Neither has any, tie
S&G: tie. Both side readable
The BoP is to prove they can remain legal while the other is illegal for a sensible reason. Read the debate's description. I met my BoP, ibtelligence 06 is lying
Since you were interested, please take a look if it interests you.
I indeed met my BoP you avoided mentioning my arguments. You also ignored the description of the debate.
Interesting. Well in that case, don't disclose that to me!
There are extremely wealthy escorts, that isn't the difference I'll focus on.
Yes, but completely in different.
Porn stars are paid much better than a prostitute is payed. ignore the whole Mia Khalfia story where she said she only being paid 12k. The industry who she work with showed receipts showing that she was payed 100k+ for the work she did in her spam.
Also look at prominent stars right now. Lana Rhoades and Riley Reid are millionaires from their careers. There is much more opportunity in that nature versus being a prozzy
Pornography is a contract with much more money and bonuses, with regular STD checks for starts, Prostitutes have no checks and are paid less. You can't make a career doing that
I only know this much info from the whole fiasco in June. I don't touch pornography anymore
As different as they are, they have similarities. For example, sexual behavior for both, etc.
Pornography and prostitution are completely different, I find it hard for PRO to win
Correct, on the same side of the law. Both are either to be legal or illegal.
I support legalisation of both.
It's a truism that they have similarities. I suspect you mean for the resolution to specify that the law should view them as the same crime?
disagree, porn is evil