Instigator / Pro
19
1417
rating
158
debates
32.59%
won
Topic

Pro is able to have his arguments describe his own arguments

Status
Finished

All stages have been completed. The voting points distribution and the result are presented below.

Arguments points
9
0
Sources points
6
6
Spelling and grammar points
3
3
Conduct points
1
3

With 3 votes and 7 points ahead, the winner is ...

seldiora
Parameters
More details
Publication date
Last update date
Category
Miscellaneous
Time for argument
Two days
Voting system
Open voting
Voting period
Two weeks
Point system
Four points
Rating mode
Unrated
Characters per argument
10,000
Contender / Con
12
1681
rating
88
debates
73.3%
won
Description
~ 134 / 5,000

just for fun.

In order for pro to win, he must sufficiently describe his arguments (including the idea of describing the description)

Added:
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better spelling and grammar
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Concession.

There's actually some fairly cool stuff you can do with this type of programming.

Added:
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better spelling and grammar
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Concession. I applaud both Pro and Con for being able to create, think through, and analyze such mind-numbing madness. Once I was able to unravel the logic in my head, it was quite entertaining to read. It was really easy to see how Pro's experience in programming helped him in this debate.

Added:
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better spelling and grammar
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

降伏
降伏
降伏
降伏