Thanks for the debate CON!
Case For Mandatory Uniforms
[A] Reduced MisbehaviorSchools with mandatory uniform requirements reported less cases of
gang involvement, disciplinary action, and bullying according to researcher Jafeth Sanchez. Another study conducted by
Brighton Young University showed that older students noticed a decrease in bullying within the school itself.
A I. Bullying is mental torture that leads to death. It’s
consequences are so massive for a problem so widespread in America. Reduction in bullying can promote a
safe environment for school so that kids do not have to fear when they come to school, and students perform better when not in fear at school
A II. This is a solution that help a wider problem in America with bullying, and promotes a safe environment where a student can learn without fear, and a step in the right direction for combatting bullying
CON states that it has no effect, however, his studies are pulled from the Patch, a website focused on a certain community, not the entirety of America. My sources are published by Universities, much more reliable than CON
[B] Unity and EqualityIn a world where it is preached to judge people equally, uniforms promote the sense of unity. In fact, this unity allows teachers to expect higher of
student and treat students better according to research
Studies also show that uniforms prevent the sharp disparity in socio economic class. That same BYU research paper concluded that students of lower income did not feel as excluded than students at public schools. The logical conclusion is that this person had equal clothing to his counterparts, so they didn’t feel like they were poor
Removal of the social class in education is key to improving the education system. Instead of worrying about whether or not you will get called out, you are worried about school and doing well
Rebuttal #1My opponent claims that freedom of expression is oppressed. My case is that comfortivity is more important than individuality.
The impact of comfortivity and safety outweighs the impact of individuality. Comfortivity can REDUCE the rate of bullying, gangs, and misconduct due to the uniformity, as shown in my case. The safety of the student is more important than anything.
Even so, there is still freedom of expression even without uniforms.
Students need to be judge on the success the student has in class versus their appearance
My impact should be preferred by the judge due to the fact that the impact much outweighs his impact, meaning if the safety of the student is in danger, there is a much greater calculus that can happen, example DEATH! Death as an impact is the worse impact that can happen. CON’s only true impact to this argument is loss of individuality, and even that is a shaky claim. I have shown that individually is not limited due to showing that creativity and individuality in your behavior, classes, and activities within school
Rebuttal #2My opponent claims that it is more expensive for uniforms but that simply isn’t true. A case study by NAESP
showed that the cost of a school uniform is less that $150 per child
That same study also polled that 86% of parents believe uniforms to be much more cost effective. A pair of jeans and a shirt now a days cost around 30-60 dollars, which is expensive for clothes.
Your source even says the government is looking for ways to reduce the price of uniforms, meaning there is a chance the prices will lower to make it more affordable. American uniforms are cheaper in general and are helping with these issues
couldn't think of anything
Thanks for the debate. Why did you concede
Shit that was fast lol
Your opponent could just say that it would be only enforced in rich private schools, negating most of your arguments. I suggest saying a specific school system, or a location.
Cheating? Not at all. If he tries to use the same argument and someone competent accepts, he will be forced to defend that argument. That will test his mettle all the same
He could just take his opponent's arguments and re-use them as his own.
While I admit what you are saying is true, this is kinda cheating consider he just lost on the opposite side.
Being able to debate both sides is an admirable skill.
Being able to debate both sides is an admirable skill.
Wait, first you argued PRO now you argue CON??????? You just switched sides after you lost an argument?
I couldn't figure out how to beat Ajabi's argument so I thought it was perfect lol
What is it I am seeing right now? Getting kicked by the other side so you swear loyalty to them? I doubt that you are using your own points now.