Instigator / Pro
Points: 42

Removal Of Welfare Checks

Finished

The voting period has ended

After 7 votes the winner is ...
SupaDudz
Debate details
Publication date
Last update
Category
Economics
Time for argument
Three days
Voting system
Open voting
Voting period
One week
Point system
Four points
Rating mode
Rated
Characters per argument
30,000
Contender / Con
Points: 16
Description
RULES OF THE ROAD
----------------------------
1. No DA, T, or Kritiks
2. Grammar should only be taken off if judge can not comprehend
3. One CP per team; non conditional
4. Round 1 is an introduction, introduce 2 advantages
5. Round 2 introduces the CP that is non conditional for the team
6. Perm doesn't exist, the plan is to remove welfare + CP.
7. Round 3 is concluding args to 2 advantages with no sources, just sum ups. Then there should be responses to the CPs
8. Failure to obey the rules wil result in a DQ and will cause all 7pts to be rewarded to the opposing team
Round 1
Published:
My opponent agrees to the Code of Conduct of debate. Let's get down to business 
-------------------
I. Not Example Of Help

The use of TANF(Welfare Checks) is not the best way we can support the people. These checks fail and there are better ways to take it out.
There are more effective ways ways to use these TANF programs.  States have gotten control and abused the power of these programs and this has caused loopholes and things like that to evolve. Then these states use the checks to help THEIR problems, focusing less on background checks and if they are eligible for the job, and this is causing hood rats and gang bangers to rely on that income to get their respect and then cause the poor people to suffer. They don't help anyone, in fact they stayed the same since the great recession. Since the funds get lower and lower now, then they fund less families and others. They fail. This article is the info


Read this up. They make great points why welfare checkes fail at helping poor families, and only help gangs and hoodlums and thugs


The article states that they are now reaching fewer families, the people that need it the most. They now focus on the individual needs and now, these states are increasing in crime. So this causes the crime rate to up. 

The argument is clear, welfare checks don't help us and is ultimately a failuire

II. Middle Class Suffer 

It's obvious that they pay taxes and do all that stuff, while holding on to jobs. The middle class suffer the most, because they pay taxes to fund these programs when all they do is give funds to hoodlums. Trump isn't planning on even cutting the taxes for middle class: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/23/us/politics/trump-tax-cuts-middle-class.html

The middle class get the blow here. TANF is state funded and federally funded. So the money gets used for funding TANF, and when it fails at it's job of providing for the good and needy, it causes the middle classes money to be wasted


The problem here is that there is no tax cuts for the middle class, so they pay this broken system of TANF to fund the thugs and gangbangers to commit crime, and then they blame the middle class for starting this. This is bad


Forfeited
Round 2
Published:
Extend
Forfeited
Round 3
Published:
Extend. 

Supa Wins :)
Forfeited
Added:
--> @RationalMadman
the debate is about how we should remove wealth fare checks from usa society
Instigator
#4
Added:
--> @RationalMadman
Checks
Instigator
#3
Added:
--> @SupaDudz
Is this about welfare cheques or welfare checks. In America you spell both the same so it's not clear what you're referring to.
#2
Added:
I aggree.
#1
#7
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
"I often quote myself. It adds spice to my conversation."
- George Bernard Shaw
#6
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Full Forfeit
#5
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Con forfeit the whole debate.
#4
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Forfeited
#3
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Full forfeit on Con's part. Pro actually had arguments, sources and didn't forfeit a round.
#2
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
FF with good sourcing by Pro and zero from Con.
#1
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments 3 points
Better sources 2 points
Better spelling and grammar 1 point
Better conduct 1 point
Reason:
Full forefeit