Rap Battle (Magira VS Seldiora)
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 4 votes and with 2 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 3
- Time for argument
- Two days
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- One week
- Point system
- Winner selection
- Voting system
- Open
No information
Con had slightly better lyrics (creativity, disses, rhyme scheme) and flow.
Rhyme scheme and harshness were unparalleled in this debate.
To me the use of a link to justify insulting someone for being single and/or chinese is hardly a true thing to credit a win for. That said, Pro still dominated throughout.
Quite a few lines were jacked from mainsteam raps and could have made Pro get sued if this were a 'real rap battle' but as this is just a casual thing and since it's like a 1:9 ratio of original:copied, I'll let it slide and not point out which ones were.
PRO's 1st round hit hard with genuine personal attacks backed with evidence, and CON couldn't really make that ground up, even if PRO was worse as the battle went on. CON should have tried to rebut some of the attacks from PRO.
Arguments: PRO. Pro highlighted heavy rhymes with more liberal usages and he is the only one who illustrated not just that his opponent is bad, but How, with evidence. Con's claims are essentially baseless. Pro is more compelling.
Sources: Pro. Pro gave the only source.
S&G: Tie. Nothing else to say.
Conduct: Con. Pro is the alt of someone who is banned. That is poor conduct!
Overall, Pro won.
**************************************************
>Reported Vote: BearMan // Mod action: Removed
>Points Awarded: temporarily disabled
>Reason for Decision:
Magira is an alt of somebody
>Reason for Mod Action:
The voter acted in such a way to suggest they did not give fair weighting to the debate content.
**************************************************
Pro being an alt of someone, doesn't seem to factor into the debate itself when it comes to voting.
This being a rap battle, it's not normally regulated. However, in an extreme case of not voting based on debate content, as a moderator I feel a need to step in...
@Intelligence
"Conduct: Con. Pro is the alt of someone who is banned. That is poor conduct!"
Were this not a choose winner, that conduct penalty would call your vote into question. However, your vote is otherwise fine.
@bear
"Magira is an alt of somebody"
That was your entire RFD. Which did not even consider what transpired inside the debate. As such, it is sadly stricken. You may of course revote if you so choose, and this being a simple misunderstanding isn't getting put into the logs.
"That dude needs to find a better hobby than creating sock puppets on DART."
His creation of the sock puppets within this side only reveals that he cannot debate.
Alright, close enough
He was a Type1 alt. That dude needs to find a better hobby than creating sock puppets on DART.
Nope
Are you an RM alt?
This should be fun.
You don't know me from anywhere. Also, I didn't accept your should= objective morality debate because I don't think it necessarily implies objective morality. Morality is only one basis that can be used to justify a "should" claim.
just who are you? Truth seeker?