Instigator / Pro
4
1731
rating
167
debates
73.05%
won
Topic
#2437

Grid structures are better than Cul-de-sac structures when it comes to the development of the city

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
0
3
Better sources
2
2
Better legibility
1
1
Better conduct
1
1

After 1 vote and with 3 points ahead, the winner is...

seldiora
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
4
Time for argument
One week
Max argument characters
12,000
Voting period
One week
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
7
1417
rating
158
debates
32.59%
won
Description

BoP is shared, Con must also prove why Cul-de-sacs are better. Pro waive r1, Con waive r4

-->
@seldiora

yeah, it felt a bit lazy. I know he is capable of more

CORRECTION: In my vote, I said "This is dropped entirely, but PRO weakens their own point later by giving a source that undermines their argument that cul-de-sacs directly lower crime."

I meant: "This is dropped entirely, but CON weakens their own point later by giving a source that undermines their argument that cul-de-sacs directly lower crime."

-->
@MisterChris

I am glad you noted that pro didnt even pull the big guns lol (history of grid, standards... etc). Maybe he was too busy.

-->
@Barney

vote

-->
@Intelligence_06

bruh. you playin devils advocate or something? You had plenty of rounds to establish the foundation and history of Grid structure. You could've forced me to throw in the towel by round 2

-->
@seldiora

No. My geography class investigated what kinds of city plannings are there and how they compare.

-->
@Intelligence_06

is this also I can I BB?