Instigator / Con
14
1483
rating
327
debates
40.21%
won
Topic
#2438

I'm on trial/What is the problem you see with me?

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
3
18
Better sources
2
12
Better legibility
6
6
Better conduct
3
6

After 6 votes and with 28 points ahead, the winner is...

Barney
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
5
Time for argument
Three days
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
One week
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Pro
42
1810
rating
49
debates
100.0%
won
Description

Disclaimer : Regardless of the setup for voting win or lose, The aim of this interaction, Is for those that view it, Learn and or take away anything that will amount to any constructive value ultimately. So that counts as anything that'll cause one to reconsider an idea, Understand a subject better, Help build a greater wealth of knowledge getting closer to truth. When either of us has accomplished that with any individual here, That's who the victor of the debate becomes.

Here you air your disputes involving the debates I been in with you or with anyone. The topics, the premises, debates that you've seen me in, let's discuss them. Hopefully everybody gets a chance, gets a turn at this as I plan to do several of these trials/confrontations.

Now this is still in the spirit of contest. As you try to prove your points valid, I will render my points to refute and or correct yours.

So in regards to the way I argue or why I made a particular point, said a particular thing, came up with a particular topic, even personal views, here's the opportunity to challenge it all in this challenge. You can question, challenge a challenge, etc.

For clarity or questions, Please send a message or comment prior to accepting debate.

-->
@seldiora
@Crocodile

In future, I do suggest having a tiny bit more detail, such as just naming a contention: Like "Mall defends 'Mr. Hitler', with sources showing that 'Mr. Hitler' was a bad person, this was a valid problem to have against him."

-->
@RationalMadman
@whiteflame
@skittlez09
@Theweakeredge

Thank you all for the quality votes!

Minor typo: I wrote pro instead of con when referring to my opponent. Contextually this shouldn't be an issue.

-->
@Mall

"Your proof of that *****in your own words****** is what?"

I have no idea why but this made me chuckle a little bit. You could've started your round with polite and cordial words but instead you chose to shout at him. LOL

Note: I left this debate alone for five days before accepting.

I don't know how to make this any clearer. You pick whatever you think I do is wrong and build a case for it and I attempt to refute it.

-->
@Mall

but u can respond

-->
@Mall

like a roast?

Good luck.

Well , this is an opportunity to make your critique as according to what the description says. I think many of you have points to make about the debates I have . We can confront these things with a direct interaction. Your inquiries are directed at me. We communicate, I'm allowed to make a counter point. It's like moving what's said in the comments to the debate rounds. Moving the fight from outside to the ring.

-->
@Mall

explain please?

mall be like : o no oromagi's gonna destroy me