Instigator / Pro
20
1475
rating
2
debates
0.0%
won
Topic

I is the real Tyrone

Status
Finished

All stages have been completed. The voting points distribution and the result are presented below.

Arguments points
3
21
Sources points
10
14
Spelling and grammar points
5
7
Conduct points
2
7

With 8 votes and 29 points ahead, the winner is ...

Tyrone
Parameters
More details
Publication date
Last update date
Category
Education
Time for argument
Three days
Voting system
Open voting
Voting period
Two weeks
Point system
Four points
Rating mode
Rated
Characters per argument
1,000
Contender / Con
49
1516
rating
1
debates
100.0%
won
Description
~ 16 / 5,000

Real Tyrone here

Added:
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better spelling and grammar
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Full Forfeit

Added:
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better spelling and grammar
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Pro was a little racist in his argument. He said, "Your whack ass rhymes will expose you for being white". He also forfeited multiple rounds. This is not convincing and poor conduct.

Added:
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better spelling and grammar
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

The mentioned ban and FF mean Con is proven to be the real Tyrone but personally, I preferred Biggy.

Added:
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better spelling and grammar
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Full forfeit

Added:
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better spelling and grammar
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

All of pro's arguments were dropped

Added:
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better spelling and grammar
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Neither side used sources. Spelling/Grammar/writing was roughly equal on both sides. Tie for each of those categories.

Conduct:
As pointed out during the debate, Pro appears to be a banned user. Additionally, he forfeited every round after the first. Conduct goes to Con for this.

Arguments:
Pro unleashed a devastating opening volley of arguments, and the style with which he did it was practically an argument in itself. However, Con delivers an inarguable rebuttal; His opponent is banned, thus Con must be the real Tyrone. Argument to Con.

Added:
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better spelling and grammar
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Full Forfeit

Added:
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better spelling and grammar
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Neither side had strong arguments; but considering the fact Con got banned because of his arguments, it goes to Con.

Tyronebiggs got banned. conduct to Con