Instigator / Pro
2
1417
rating
158
debates
32.59%
won
Topic
#2488

DART Should Increase Its Character Limit

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
0
3
Better sources
0
2
Better legibility
1
1
Better conduct
1
1

After 1 vote and with 5 points ahead, the winner is...

K_Michael
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
3
Time for argument
Two days
Max argument characters
30,000
Voting period
One month
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
7
1581
rating
38
debates
64.47%
won
Description

I'm assuming that making the limit higher is costless and easy. The current limit is 30,000.

bump

Regarding cross examination: with a high amount of time for arguments, cross examination could be done within the comments and then copy/pasted into the arguments.

bump for votes

My argument being said though, I think 40,000 or even 50,000 would be a fine upper limit for Whiteflame.

SEO Hacker source: https://seo-hacker.com/traffic-numbers-matter/

cloud storage source: https://cloud.google.com/storage/pricing

-->
@K_Michael

the fact that DART doesn't have Cross Examination further helps my case if you think about it.

-->
@DebateArt.com

My poor fingers ;-;

-->
@MisterChris

Wow, I imagine you did a lot of typing haha

-->
@K_Michael

Sorry mate :/

-->
@DebateArt.com

I mean, I almost hit the ceiling once (in my tournament debate with Speed) but it was a non-issue.

I suppose some people philosophers have written entire books, in responses to arguments made by some other philosophers, in history.

-->
@DebateArt.com

Shhh don't spoil my arguments

From the technical point of view, it's not a problem to bump the character limit but is it really necessary? If it often that somebody actually reaches this limit?

-->
@Intelligence_06

thoughts?