Any Topic 3
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 6 votes and with 6 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 4
- Time for argument
- Three days
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- One month
- Point system
- Winner selection
- Voting system
- Open
Pro waives round 1 and con posts a topic and definitions. Pro will CHOOSE HIS SIDE in round 2 (he can become con on the topic, and then con will argue pro side) and then they will debate the resolution. Have fun.
“Rap battle” and “song battle” cannot be chosen as topic.
Full Forfeit
A forfeiture is a forfeiture and a forfeiture never wins.
I am confused by the assignment of Pro and Con by the DArt system because Ancap460 left the choice of Pro/Con open, and seldiora chose Con, yet seldiora was assigned Pro, due to the resolution being a statement in favor of a world government, yet seldiora's argument is in the form of interrogatives, making it obvious Con was the chosen position, and Ancap460 then forfeited all subsequent rounds. It appears other voters have accepted the systemic assignment of seldiora as Pro, eventhough the choice was Con. Therefore, I will ignore the Pro/Con positions and proceed by screen name:
Seldiora posed some very good questions which, themselves, pose sufficient argument that, apparently, Ancap460 could not rebut, and, subsequently, forfeited the debate. Point to seldiora
Full Forfeit.
Full Forfeit.
Forfeiture.
In the future, whoever initiated this debate [my vote concluded it was Ancap460, but now I'm not so sure, recalling that the instigator is is usually Pro, but that can be properly assigned by hte instigator, and that was a failed effort.
Whichever of you was really instigator, in the future, don't get cute with not providing a subject, not choosing your side of the debate clearly, and waiving a round [which I consider a forfeit]. Good thing this was just a winner system and not a four-point judgment, because this would have been conduct failure for making the debate incohenrent.
easy vote
Bump