Instigator / Con
7
1483
rating
327
debates
40.21%
won
Topic
#2620

Your proposal to the "race" problem......

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
3
3
Better sources
2
4
Better legibility
2
2
Better conduct
0
2

After 2 votes and with 4 points ahead, the winner is...

SirAnonymous
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
4
Time for argument
Two days
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
One week
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Pro
11
1532
rating
3
debates
100.0%
won
Description

Disclaimer : Regardless of the setup for voting win or lose, The aim of this interaction, Is for those that view it, Learn and or take away anything that will amount to any constructive value ultimately. So that counts as anything that'll cause one to reconsider an idea, Understand a subject better, Help build a greater wealth of knowledge getting closer to truth. When either of us has accomplished that with any individual here, That's who the victor of the debate becomes.

Please provide a proposed solution to "racism". What is your method, code, idea, formula, whatever, that will help replace or eliminate all "racism" so that everyone will receive the proper treatment not involving "racial" discrimination?

How would you work or have others work as proposed to improve "race relations"?

Now be it that it's a proposal, you can't prove your method will work. But you do have to prove it is the best method yet, possibly ever thought up.

If the deductive reasoning is there to stand tenable with your concept , I'll stand to concede that. If I am able to undermine what's said on the basis of invalid points, you can come back to try again in another challenge.

For questions , please comment /send a message.

Criterion
Con
Tie
Pro
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Args: SirA presented a solution that will 100% solve racism no matter what, and since it is 100% effective at solving its field, Mall's criticism falls short, as his argument is like when someone asked the smoothest-running game with best graphics and someone else offered such game, and then Mall popped up saying "Is it really a good game? It can't even smoothly run on my default stock MacOs Laptop!"

Sources: SirA presented some sources, vs Mall's nothing.

S&G: Tie. Both sides presentable, as always.

Conduct: Mall waived the 1st round without such rules by adding no new arguments at all and used an unorganized format. SirA used an overall more organized style of writing. Although not that much, I would award the conduct point to SirA.

Criterion
Con
Tie
Pro
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Conduct to pro, for con demanding the best solution possible.

Even ignoring the description, however, Con made excellent questioning this time around. It was a little bit complicated but there was indeed a lot of doubt. It's difficult to say for certain that there is absolutely no solution that would not solve the problem. Mall pointed out that people who die to cancer "lose" the battle, and hence cannot be called improvement if everyone in the world died of cancer. Sir Anonymous did mighty fine and was very humorous, but I'm with mall here. Sir pointed out that racism will no longer exist since humans no longer exist, but the impacts here are pointed well out with Mall -- he infers our efforts matter a lot and we could potentially be undermining our progress since so many people have already died for us to live on and solve racism. Mall also points out that people who want racism to be solved are unlikely to want to die themselves if they can implement some sort of plan. So by a narrow margin I give arguments to Mall.